Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component:
module
Priority:
Major
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
27 Jan 2017 at 10:08 UTC
Updated:
6 Mar 2017 at 06:14 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #2
PA robot commentedWe are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)
Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).
I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.
Comment #3
jeetendrakumar commentedHello kumaratulesh,
Please fix AjaxError.
Please see image.
Comment #4
kumaratulesh commentedHello Jeetendrakumar,
Thanks for reporting your issue. I have deeply tested it on all Drupal 8 versions and on different OS, it works smooth and the reported issue is not reproduced. I would like to see your .htaccess code located at: project_folder/.htaccess. I can bet its an issue with the .htaccess file. Share your code so that I can help you out.
Comment #5
deepanker_bhalla commentedHi,
The module is working absolutely fine on my system. But I think with the Filter mechanism. When you selects something then the filter works, but to reset it back I need to go back and once again fire that link. Thus do put reset for the filter mechanism as per me.
Comment #6
kumaratulesh commentedThanks for your suggestion, i have implemented the form reset functionality.
Comment #7
kumaratulesh commentedComment #8
jeetendrakumar commented@kumaratulesh:
module is working fine for me.
Manual Code review:
1. Please implement hook_help();
/**
* Implements hook_help().
*/
Comment #9
visabhishek commented@jeetendrakumar : Nice suggestions , but not an application blocker. Anything else that you found or should this be RTBC instead?
Comment #10
pdenooijer commentedManual Review
Comment #11
pdenooijer commentedComment #12
jeetendrakumar commentedRTBC+
Comment #13
kumaratulesh commentedComment #14
kumaratulesh commented@jeetendrakumar: As per your suggestion i have implemented the hook_help().
Comment #15
kumaratulesh commentedComment #16
kumaratulesh commentedComment #17
kumaratulesh commentedComment #18
deepanker_bhalla commented@kumaratulesh,
Thanks for the reset button functionality. It is working fine now. Great module to get the information on the menu information as well user, node also.
Comment #19
kumaratulesh commentedComment #20
aloknarwaria commentedHi @kumaratulesh,
The module works fine for me. I have only one suggestion for you.
Your module name is "Events Log Track" so the machine name is generated by your module name is "events_log_track".
I suggest you to please change your main directory name from "event_log_track" to "events_log_track" or vice versa.
It is recommended not an issue. Great work :)
Comment #21
kumaratulesh commented@aloknarwaria,
Thanks for your review but the main directory name is "events_log_track" based on module name "Events Log Track".
Also you can check in project git URL path the name of directory is correct i.e. "events_log_track".
Comment #22
aloknarwaria commentedHi @kumaratulesh,
Please find the attachment can you please have a look and let me know why there files names are started with "event_log_track"
if your module name is "events_log_track".
Sorry if I missed anything please let me know that.
Comment #23
kumaratulesh commented@aloknarwaria,
Machine name is generated by my module is "event_log_track" not "events_log_track", same as files name.
For you reference you can see the core modules like:
Module Name -> Machine name
1. Actions -> action
2. Activity Tracker -> tracker
Machine name of the module does not generated based on module name.
Comment #24
aloknarwaria commented@kumaratulesh, No further arguments I just try to tell you that, that was recommended by drupal regard the naming conventions. It's ok if you did not like to follow that recommended way.
Comment #25
klausiReview of the 8.x-1.x branch (commit 3bb0359):
This automated report was generated with PAReview.sh, your friendly project application review script. You can also use the online version to check your project. You have to get a review bonus to get a review from me.
manual review:
Otherwise looks good to me.
Thanks for your contribution, Atulesh!
I updated your account so you can promote this to a full project and also create new projects as either a sandbox or a "full" project.
Here are some recommended readings to help with excellent maintainership:
You can find lots more contributors chatting on IRC in #drupal-contribute. So, come hang out and stay involved!
Thanks, also, for your patience with the review process. Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review. I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.
Thanks to the dedicated reviewer(s) as well.
Comment #26
klausiUpdating issue credits.
Comment #27
kumaratulesh commented