Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component:
module
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
21 Aug 2015 at 16:02 UTC
Updated:
22 Feb 2016 at 21:44 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #2
PA robot commentedThere are some errors reported by automated review tools, did you already check them? See http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxkallehauge2492081git
We are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)
Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).
I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.
Comment #3
kallehauge commentedCorrected the mistakes found in Pareview, that my outdated PHPCS (Drupal standards) didn't detect and a few other requirements that I missed on the checklist
Comment #4
kallehauge commentedWups, a link to the latest pareview build :)
Comment #5
rashid_786 commentedThanks for your contribution, here are my observations.
* Implements Hook_help() to get more understanding about this module to new users.
+ You used constant variables with double underscore e.g.
FACETAPI_SCROLLING_LINKS__ACTIVATION_WIDTH, can you explain more on this? why is it necessary to use double underscore?Comment #6
rashid_786 commentedComment #7
kallehauge commentedHi Rashid, thank you for reviewing :)
/ Kallehauge :)
Comment #8
Gorka Guridi commentedAutomated Review
Minor problem found by pareview.sh:
http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxkallehauge2492081git-...
Manual Review
Individual user account
Yes: Follows the guidelines for individual user accounts.
No duplication
Yes: Does not cause module duplication and/or fragmentation.
Master Branch
Yes: Follows the guidelines for master branch.
Licensing
Yes: Follows the licensing requirements.
3rd party assets/code
Yes: Follows the guidelines for 3rd party assets/code.
README.txt/README.md
No: Does not follow the guidelines for in-project documentation and/or the README Template.
Observations:
* Section formatting not as in template.
Code long/complex enough for review
Yes: Follows the guidelines for project length and complexity.
Secure code
Yes: Meets the security requirements.
Coding style & Drupal API usage
facetapi_scrolling_links.module:136 : placeholder !default is wrongly added as parameter 'default' in t function.
facetapi_scrolling_links.module:158 : same as above.
widget_scrolling_lincs.inc:59 : why is it returning $this?
The code looks good, well documented. I'm not sure that the module deserve to be back to needs work due to my findings, all of them seem small and won't affect the functionality of the module. I think it's ready for production use.
Comment #9
kallehauge commentedOh, for some reason I never got a notification about new activity in here. Sorry for ignoring you Gorka Giridi!
I have corrected the last issue of the automated test and fixed the wrongfully implemented placeholders. Thank you very much for the detailed review and your time!
/ Kallehauge
Comment #10
kallehauge commentedComment #11
klausiThank you for your reviews. When finishing your review comment also set the issue status either to "needs work" (you found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (you found no major flaws).
Review of the 7.x-1.x branch (commit 3ba110e):
This automated report was generated with PAReview.sh, your friendly project application review script. You can also use the online version to check your project. You have to get a review bonus to get a review from me.
Otherwise looks good after a manual review.
Thanks for your contribution, André!
I updated your account so you can promote this to a full project and also create new projects as either a sandbox or a "full" project.
Here are some recommended readings to help with excellent maintainership:
You can find lots more contributors chatting on IRC in #drupal-contribute. So, come hang out and stay involved!
Thanks, also, for your patience with the review process. Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review. I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.
Thanks to the dedicated reviewer(s) as well.