Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component:
module
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
12 Jan 2015 at 23:19 UTC
Updated:
19 Feb 2015 at 10:04 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
PA robot commentedThere are some errors reported by automated review tools, did you already check them? See http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxIztok2406101git
We are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)
Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).
I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.
Comment #2
iztok commentedComment #3
paranojik commentedAll looks good. The code conforms to coding standards, validation is in place, works as described.
Great contribution!
Thanks, Iztok!
Comment #4
alesr commentedReviewed the code. Syntactically the code is fine. Complies with coding standards.
Semantically there could be some optimizations done for example returning boolan values in _heap_analytics_visibility_pages() function.
But RTBC from me too.
Comment #5
iztok commentedComment #6
naveenvalechaAutomated Review
Review of the 7.x-1.x branch (commit 929d58e):
This automated report was generated with PAReview.sh, your friendly project application review script. You can also use the online version to check your project. You have to get a review bonus to get a review from me.
Source: http://pareview.sh/ - PAReview.sh online service
Manual Review
'type' => MENU_NORMAL_ITEM,, becauase if you not provide the type its by default is MENU_NORMAL_ITEMPlease specify on the project page as well.
The starred items (*) are fairly big issues and warrant going back to Needs Work. Items marked with a plus sign (+) are important and should be addressed before a stable project release. The rest of the comments in the code walkthrough are recommendations.
Not found any security issue,major api problem and licensing issue.So lets take a git admin review.
If added, please don't remove the security tag, we keep that for statistics and to show examples of security problems.
This review uses the Project Application Review Template.
Comment #7
klausiReview of the 7.x-1.x branch (commit 929d58e):
This automated report was generated with PAReview.sh, your friendly project application review script. You can also use the online version to check your project. You have to get a review bonus to get a review from me.
manual review:
No critical blockers, so ...
Thanks for your contribution, Iztok!
I updated your account so you can promote this to a full project and also create new projects as either a sandbox or a "full" project.
Here are some recommended readings to help with excellent maintainership:
You can find lots more contributors chatting on IRC in #drupal-contribute. So, come hang out and stay involved!
Thanks, also, for your patience with the review process. Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review. I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.
Thanks to the dedicated reviewer(s) as well.
Comment #8
iztok commentedThank you klausi for promotion.
Thank you paranojik, alesr and naveenvalecha for the review, much appreciated!