[D7] Comment Stats

There are some errors reported by automated review tools, did you already check them? See http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxnitink2465815git

We are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)

Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).

I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.

Thanks for the contribution nitin.k, looks a very useful module.

Manual Review

Individual user account

Yes: Follows the guidelines for individual user accounts.

No duplication

There is already a module for data statistics https://www.drupal.org/project/statspro but it doesn't focus on comments as this module does.
Yes: Does not cause module duplication and/or fragmentation.

Master Branch

Yes: Follows the guidelines for master branch.

Licensing

Yes: Follows the licensing requirements.

3rd party assets/code

Yes: Follows the guidelines for 3rd party assets/code.

README.txt/README.md

guidelines for in-project documentation and/or the README Template.

Code long/complex enough for review

Yes: Follows the guidelines for project length and complexity.

Secure code

Yes: Meets the security requirements.

Coding style & Drupal API usage

[List of identified issues in no particular order. Use (*) and (+) to indicate an issue importance. Replace the text below by the issues themselves:

1. This module is well formatter and does a good use of Drupal API

The starred items (*) are fairly big issues and warrant going back to Needs Work. Items marked with a plus sign (+) are important and should be addressed before a stable project release. The rest of the comments in the code walkthrough are recommendations.

This review uses the Project Application Review Template.

Automated Review

Pareview.sh does not show any errors - http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxnitink2465815git

Manual Review

Individual user account

Yes: Follows the guidelines for individual user accounts.

No duplication

No: Causes module duplication and/or fragmentation.

Master Branch

Yes: Follows the guidelines for master branch.

Licensing

Yes: Follows the licensing requirements.

3rd party assets/code

Yes: Follows the guidelines for 3rd party assets/code.

README.txt/README.md

Yes: Follows the guidelines for in-project documentation and/or the README Template.

Code long/complex enough for review

Yes: Follows the guidelines for project length and complexity.

Coding style & Drupal API usage

1. As we change our project application process in #2453587: [policy, no patch] Changes to the project application review process we are not allowed to block applications base on module duplication. We can still recommend collaboration over competition, but we should not enforce it.

2. css/comment_stats.css
   .subject_wrapper a {
     font-size: 16px;
     font-color: lightblue;
   }
   

   font-color is not a CSS property.

3. (+)Coder show a lot of errors:
   Check the coder-error.txt
   You should fix those issues.

The starred items (*) are fairly big issues and warrant going back to Needs Work. Items marked with a plus sign (+) are important and should be addressed before a stable project release. The rest of the comments in the code walkthrough are recommendations.

If added, please don't remove the security tag, we keep that for statistics and to show examples of security problems.

This review uses the Project Application Review Template.

Here is the coder-error.txt

pareview.sh was updated, you can now also find the errors on http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxnitink2465815git

Automated Review

No issues identified by pareview.sh http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxnitink2465815git

Manual Review

Individual user account

[Yes: Follows] the guidelines for individual user accounts.

No duplication

[Yes: Does not cause] module duplication and/or fragmentation.

Master Branch

[Yes: Follows] the guidelines for master branch.

Licensing

[Yes: Follows] the licensing requirements.

3rd party assets/code

[Yes: Follows] the guidelines for 3rd party assets/code.

README.txt/README.md

[Yes: Follows] the guidelines for in-project documentation and/or the README Template.

Code long/complex enough for review

[Yes: Follows] the guidelines for project length and complexity.

Secure code

[Yes: Meets the security requirements.

Coding style & Drupal API usage

Looks good.

This review uses the Project Application Review Template.

Thanks for your contribution!

I updated your account so you can promote this to a full project and also create new projects as either a sandbox or a "full" project.

Here are some recommended readings to help with excellent maintainership:

• Dries' post on Responsible maintainers
• Best practices for creating and maintaining projects
• Maintaining a drupal.org project with Git
• Commit messages - providing history and credit
• Release naming conventions.
• Helping maintainers in the issue queues

You can find lots more contributors chatting on IRC in #drupal-contribute. So, come hang out and stay involved!

Thanks, also, for your patience with the review process. Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review. I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.

Thanks to the dedicated reviewer(s) as well.