Active
Project:
TableField
Version:
8.x-2.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
5 Feb 2014 at 09:18 UTC
Updated:
16 Dec 2022 at 09:47 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
There is a port of 7.x-2.x to 8.x-2.x. It even has some minor additions in functionality which version 7 does not yet have.
Comments
Comment #1
sebas5384 commentedHere's a first WIP sandbox of the Drupal 8 version.
Is not working 100% but was a nice start :)
Here's the Sandbox: https://www.drupal.org/sandbox/sebas5384/2311397
And the authors:
Walmyr:
--author="wlsf82 <wlsf82@2914625.no-reply.drupal.org>"Felipe:
--author="felipeduardo <felipeduardo@1232108.no-reply.drupal.org>"Sebas:
--author="sebas5384 <sebas5384@567694.no-reply.drupal.org>"Cheers!,
Sebas.
Comment #2
vitalie commentedHere's to catch up the issue with existing commits.
There is now a dev branch for 8.x-2.x which started by refactoring work done in the sandbox project. A big part of that effort was sponsored by Wunderkraut and the rest I did in my own time.
Comment #3
vitalie commentedComment #5
vitalie commenteddev version released, so closing this issue.
https://www.drupal.org/node/2653518
Comment #6
lolandese commentedUpgrade path has not been tested therefore for now an alpha release would be most appropriate. See https://www.drupal.org/node/1015226.
Created an 8.x-2.0-alpha1 tag.
Comment #7
lolandese commentedRe-opening as (with time) we would also need to port 7.x-3.x.
Comment #8
lolandese commentedComment #9
lolandese commentedPort 7.x-3.x features to a new 8.x-3.x version (to be created).
Comment #10
lolandese commentedTitle change to cover the changed objective of the issue.
Comment #11
colanIs there still a need for a 3.x branch? What would the difference be? 2.x seems quite popular already.
Comment #12
lolandese commentedNew features in the 7.x-3.x branch (not in D8 yet)
Disallow: */themelessin the robots.txt file.Please help by porting above features to D8. We always commit with attribution to the patch author.
Comment #13
colanYes, I saw that, but could we simply add these features to the 2.x branch, or is the technical design too different?
Comment #14
lolandese commentedI gave it some thought. IMHO it makes more sense to keep feature parity between the same branches on D7 and D8 without blocking new releases on the 2.x branch.
That means that if the features mentioned in #12 do get into D8, we should open the 8.x-3.x branch for it. In D7 the database structure has changed between the 2.x and the 3.x branch. That means also database update hooks in the install file are needed. That was then the reason to bump up the branch number from 2 to 3. For D8 the same logic applies.
Comment #15
lolandese commentedMost of the related issues that have led to the 3.x branch can be found on the release notes. It might be helpful to borrow some of the code found in the patches of the issues to reach feature parity of the D8 version of the Tablefield module.
Feel also free to reopen the issues found there, mark them with a 8.x-3.x version (to be created) and give them the status "Patch (to be ported)". That is better than opening new issues as others would likely miss out on the information that led to the D7 feature that might be useful for D8 as well.
Best strategy when working on these features is to:
Comment #16
larowlanShould we create new issues for each one?
Should we update the project page to link each feature to the respective issues so folks can know where to help out?
Comment #17
colan4.x might make more sense at this point so it's not tied to D8 specifically.
Comment #18
avpaderno