Closed (won't fix)
Project:
Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component:
module
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
11 Nov 2016 at 06:55 UTC
Updated:
27 Feb 2017 at 11:25 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #2
anup.singh commentedComment #3
nikhilsukul commentedThanks Anup,
I will review it
Comment #4
nikhilsukul commentedUnassigning this issue as it is for community review
Comment #5
PA robot commentedWe are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)
Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).
I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.
Comment #6
vipul.patil7888 commentedHi Anup,
i reviewed your module please fix below issues:
1) Add hook_help(not a blocking issue)
2) use t function in queue_listing_order.inc (not a blocking issue)
3) track_styles.css should be inside css folder (not a blocking issue)
4) Please add more informations in readme.txt and project page(not a blocking issue)
5) Remove php tags for file doc comment, they are not required.
Comment #7
klausi@vipul.patil7888: Thanks for your review! Is this now RTBC or are there application blockers left and this should be "needs work"?
Comment #8
vipul.patil7888 commentedHi Klausi,
As per my review, i have not found any blocking issue, though minor issues related to drupal standards needs to be fixed.
Thanks
Comment #9
web247 commentedAutomated Review returned quite alot of issues and, while many come from miss-indented lines, there are still some fairly big ones:
There are some more, but the pareview.sh page displays them better.
Given the fact that there are so many issues, I will not do a manual review just yet. Can you please fix the issues reported by the automated review ? Thanks.
Comment #10
web247 commentedComment #11
anup.singh commentedHi vipul.patil7888, web247
Thanks for the review you have done for my module, I have fixed all the issue raised by you.
Below is the status for each issue
By Vipul
1) Add hook_help(not a blocking issue) (Done : added hook_help)
2) use t function in queue_listing_order.inc (not a blocking issue) (Done : added t() function for all the string)
3) track_styles.css should be inside css folder (not a blocking issue)(Done : moved file in css folder)
4) Please add more information in readme.txt and project page(not a blocking issue)(Done : added more info in both readme and project page)
5) Remove php tags for file doc comment, they are not required.(Done : removed php tag from tpl)
By web247
Fixed all the issue raised within Automated Review. Done
Automated Review
Please let me know in case I have missed any issue, for now I am moving the issue to Need Review.
Thank
anup.singh
Comment #12
anup.singh commentedComment #13
anup.singh commentedComment #14
web247 commentedHey there anup,
The Automated Review returned only 4 missindented lines (4 spaces instead of 2) on commerce_track_order.admin.inc - lines 24-27. This should be fixed. Otherwise, looks good.
I took a more in-depth look at your project and here's my manual review:
Coding style & Drupal API usage
(*) You have a call to system_settings_form() in commerce_track_order_configuration() that creates 2 variables that the project uses, but those variables are not deleted in hook_uninstall()
(*) In csv_upload.inc, at line 26, you have a partially translated string (' To download CSV Template' is not translated)
(+) In your .module file, at line 272, you have a module_invoke_all call, but that hook is not implemented in .api.php (the file does not exist); every hook you declare shoul have a snippet in .api.php and good documentation for other users to be able to implement it
Recommendations (minor, but could improve the quality of your code):
Comment #15
klausi@web247: wow, nice review! I think most of the points are pretty minor and should not hold up this application, anything else that you found or should this be RTBC instead?
Comment #16
khalid ansari commentedHi Anup,
i reviewed your module.
Please Make sure you always use t() to use Strings. in Your Template files, Strings are used without t().
Comment #17
PA robot commentedClosing due to lack of activity. If you are still working on this application, you should fix all known problems and then set the status to "Needs review". (See also the project application workflow).
I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.