Hey all. In my setup, it would be greatly advantageous to only run imagecache scale on images that are actually larger than the scale size. Anything smaller it would be much faster to serve as-is. This would save quite a bit on cpu, I'd think, and has no downsides I can see.

Comments

fizk’s picture

Status: Active » Closed (fixed)

Please reopn if this is still an issue with ImageCache 6.x-2.0-rc1.