Taxonomy terms not having machine readable names causes a few issues, most notably name lookup in views arguments where it's hard to transliterate certain values consistently and reliably. merlinofchaos mentioned this need in irc but didn't open an issue yet.
Comments
Comment #1
jazzslider commentedHello!
This would be extremely helpful for integrating taxonomy with the features module too, especially if vocabularies had machine-readable names as well. The features API strongly recommends that exportable items have machine-readable names for portability purposes; until this functionality is a part of taxonomy, there's not really a practical way to include vocabularies in exported features without the help of a third-party module (e.g., exportables).
Actually, I'd love it if this could eventually be backported to D6 too, but I don't know how the feature freezes work…is it possible to add new functionality to older versions of core modules, at least while the version is still supported?
Thanks!
Adam
Comment #2
jazzslider commentedDid some more checking; all the sites we're working on currently are running Drupal 6, so I didn't have a copy of D7 available prior to my last comment …as it turns out, D7 already has machine-readable vocabulary names.
That still leaves the original poster's question, though…machine names for terms could be very useful as well.
Thanks!
Adam
Comment #3
catchThis isn't going to make it into 7.
Comment #4
xjmTracking.
Comment #5
jibranIs this still relevant for views? Tagging VDC for opinion. Personally I don't think we need this.
Comment #18
catchTaxonomy terms can have custom fields now so there's zero need for this in core as such.