Active
Project:
Webform
Version:
6.2.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Plan
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
3 Mar 2021 at 17:08 UTC
Updated:
2 Oct 2023 at 13:43 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Per the comments section of a recent jrockowitz blog post:
I always welcome co-maintainers to the Webform module. Maintaining this module is a significant undertaking. In the next few months, I will try to figure out a plan/process for sustaining the Webform module.
Given the background reading from the current maintainer on availability (1, 2, 3), I've created this issue for transparency to encompass the plan/process for a more distributed approach to sustain the Webform project.
@tbd
@likely a lot of tasks.
Comments
Comment #2
jrockowitz commentedI think the most important thing is for people to read co-maintaining projects.
Comment #3
paulocsHello @jrockowitz,
I read your post "Drupal or not Drupal". The Drupal Community will lose a lot without your contributions. :(
I have interesting to help maintain the Webform module and keep it updated. I think it is very important to have someone available to contribute with the big webform module.
Please let me know what you think and if you have any suggestion. :)
Thanks!
Comment #4
WebbehI think @jrockowitz's comment in #3201435-2: Co-maintenance plan for the Webform project might need a little expansion to describe what a potential co-maintainer would need to accomplish, as Webform is a fairly exhaustive and widely used contrib project.
Just to be clear, this is not the issue for folks to blindly apply for co-maintainer status unless they've thoroughly read the documentation linked and have demonstrated focus on understanding the code underlying Webform and have already contributed back to the issue queue and project growth/releases.
Bolding for emphasis:
@jrockowitz, let me know if I'm off-base here, but I want to make sure to keep this issue as focused and goal-oriented as possible. If this is the intent, I'll update the issue description with a more thorough explanation of how folks can begin contributing back towards becoming a co-maintainer.
Comment #5
paulocsI totally agree with you @Webbeh! I commented because I think I can help.
I know how important Webform is and I know it is a big responsibility.
I'm always trying to help the Drupal Community as I have time (you can see the issues I've worked on).
I really would like to know what are the plans for the module and I'm making myself available. Just it :)
Comment #6
jrockowitz commented@Webbeh Your comment in #4 is spot-on and helps take some of the burdens off of me to sort out the roles for "co-maintainers" of the Webform module.
Generally, a co-maintainer understands the codebase and quality expectations. For example, I spend a fair amount of time writing automated tests.
At the same time, I could see a non-technical maintainer helping to wrangle the project page and issue queue, and they need only the permissions to do these tasks.
For reference, I will list out the different maintainer permissions, and maybe these will help define the co-maintainer roles.
Comment #7
jrockowitz commentedFirst, I want to #3203560: Clean up the list of maintainers and establish a policy for maintainers and sponsoring organizations for the Webform module.
Comment #8
chris matthews commentedIs there a 'next step' for this issue, or should it be closed as outdated?
https://git.drupalcode.org/project/webform/-/blob/6.x/README.md#maintainers
Comment #9
jrockowitz commentedSince I have some open collective funds supporting, I can review and commit MRs as needed.
For someone to step in and help co-maintain, they have to commit to ensuring test coverage for most MRs.
Comment #10
liam morland