Session Cache Form stores additional information in 'cache_form' table, which allow to maintain table more flexible.
When user logged out, module deletes all 'cache_form' records for his session.
In case session was dropped by drupal, module has hook_cron() implementation to clear 'cache_form' table for records which has sessions ids that already expired.

Following this issue, I created this project.

Link to sandbox

https://www.drupal.org/sandbox/impol/2465097

Clone repository

git clone --branch 7.x-1.x http://git.drupal.org/sandbox/impol/2465097.git session_cache_form
cd session_cache_form

Comments

impol’s picture

Issue summary: View changes
impol’s picture

Issue summary: View changes
PA robot’s picture

Multiple Applications
It appears that there have been multiple project applications opened under your username:

Project 1: https://www.drupal.org/node/2503707

Project 2: https://www.drupal.org/node/2212035

As successful completion of the project application process results in the applicant being granted the 'Create Full Projects' permission, there is no need to take multiple applications through the process. Once the first application has been successfully approved, then the applicant can promote other projects without review. Because of this, posting multiple applications is not necessary, and results in additional workload for reviewers ... which in turn results in longer wait times for everyone in the queue. With this in mind, your secondary applications have been marked as 'closed(duplicate)', with only one application left open (chosen at random).

If you prefer that we proceed through this review process with a different application than the one which was left open, then feel free to close the 'open' application as a duplicate, and re-open one of the project applications which had been closed.

I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.

PA robot’s picture

We are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)

Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).

I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.

Daniel.Moberly’s picture

Automated Review

No issues.

Manual Review

Individual user account
Yes: Follows the guidelines for individual user accounts.
No duplication
Yes: Does not cause module duplication and/or fragmentation.
Master Branch
Yes: Follows the guidelines for master branch.
Licensing
Yes: Follows the licensing requirements.
3rd party assets/code
Yes: Follows the guidelines for 3rd party assets/code.
README.txt/README.md
No: Does not follow the guidelines for in-project documentation and/or the README Template.
  • README.txt is missing the required "REQUIREMENTS" section per the README guidelines
  • README.txt is missing the required "CONFIGURATION" section per the README guidelines
  • README.txt line 12: you should indicate that this variable needs to be set in the settings.php file
    Code long/complex enough for review
    No: Does not follow the guidelines for project length and complexity. Project is less than 120 lines and has fewer than 5 functions.
    Secure code
    Yes: Meets the security requirements.
    Coding style & Drupal API usage
    1. You should add "Implements hook_HOOKNAME" comments to your functions

    This review uses the Project Application Review Template.

    darol100’s picture

    Status: Needs review » Postponed (maintainer needs more info)

    @impol,

    Code too short
    This project is too short to approve you as git vetted user. We are currently discussing how much code we need, but everything with less than 120 lines of code or less than 5 functions cannot be seriously reviewed. However, we can promote this single project manually to a full project for you.

    Would you be interested on Single project promotion ?

    Beside that, I have review your project and I did not see any blockers. No errors from the coder module nor the pareview.sh

    @Daniel.Moberly ,
    I have change the status to see if @impol want a Single project promotion.

    impol’s picture

    @darol100 Yeah, I think it would be great to promote it as single project. Thanks!

    darol100’s picture

    Status: Postponed (maintainer needs more info) » Reviewed & tested by the community
    Issue tags: +PAreview: single application approval

    Adding the Single project promote tag.

    impol’s picture

    Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Closed (fixed)

    As I already have the permission to promote this project, I think I can close this task.