Closed (duplicate)
Project:
Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component:
module
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
19 Sep 2014 at 21:58 UTC
Updated:
9 Sep 2018 at 20:35 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
timodwhit commentedComment #2
timodwhit commentedComment #3
PA robot commentedProject 1: https://www.drupal.org/node/2341757
Project 2: https://www.drupal.org/node/2168155
As successful completion of the project application process results in the applicant being granted the 'Create Full Projects' permission, there is no need to take multiple applications through the process. Once the first application has been successfully approved, then the applicant can promote other projects without review. Because of this, posting multiple applications is not necessary, and results in additional workload for reviewers ... which in turn results in longer wait times for everyone in the queue. With this in mind, your secondary applications have been marked as 'closed(duplicate)', with only one application left open (chosen at random).
If you prefer that we proceed through this review process with a different application than the one which was left open, then feel free to close the 'open' application as a duplicate, and re-open one of the project applications which had been closed.
I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.
Comment #4
PA robot commentedWe are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)
Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).
I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.
Comment #5
timodwhit commentedComment #6
justy commentedThank you for your contribution!
I have manually reviewed this module and it works great in most cases.
However, there are a few issues found. Please address them.
1. There are still some issues reported by automated review tool. See http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxtimodwhit2341739git
2. Function function sharethisfield_field_extra_fields()
There seems be an undefined variable $extra.
3. In one of my test content types, the ShareThis field appeared twice, after selecting the checkbox. (see screenshot)
Comment #7
justy commentedforget to change the status
Comment #8
timodwhit commentedJusty, thank you so much for taking the time to review the module!
1) Fixed the line length warnings. Didn't see any other issues.
2) Just saw this. Should be corrected.
3) I believe the dup is because you have ShareThis display per content type and not as a block. I added a check for that so now if the content type is selected, the module won't show the field.
Thank you again for reviewing, I greatly appreciate it!
Comment #9
naveenvalechaUpdated issue summary.
Comment #10
naveenvalechaComment #11
naveenvalechaAwesome module!
I suggest to add the package as "SHARING" in sharethisfield.info file.As sharethis module has the same package.
Please add some more information about the project so that I can review its full functionality.
Comment #12
skdrupal88Hey, the code looks very clear, but there are some small issues:
1) It's not necessary to wrap name and description to double quotes in .info file, check https://www.drupal.org/node/542202
2) You have to remove all created variables in hook_uninstall()
Comment #13
timodwhit commented@naveenvalecha : Thanks for the tip on Sharing, That has been added. As far as the more information, what specifically are you looking for?
@korgik: Thank you for the help. Both changes have been implemented.
Comment #14
naveenvalecha@timodwhit,
have u done the requested changes ? and if you wanna someone will review the code then change the issue status to 'Needs Review'.
Comment #15
timodwhit commented@naveenvalecha sure have. Thanks for that.
Comment #16
naveenvalechaCool!
Some few points need to fix which are release blocker:
Comment #17
klausihook_help() and an incomplete README are surely not application blockers, anything else that you found or should this be RTBC instead?
Comment #18
naveenvalechaYup not found anything else that seems to be the Release blocker. Love to set this RTBC :)
Comment #19
naveenvalecha@timodwhit,
you need Review bonus to come in high priority list so that git administers will take a look at your application.
Comment #20
kscheirerIf that fails for whatever reason please get back to us and set this back to "ready to be committed".
If all this module does is provide the sharethis block as a field, it seems like it should belong in the ShareThis module.
Comment #21
timodwhit commentedComment #22
avpaderno