Decide on the list of user contributions to be included on user profiles

Do we want badges for any of the more official stuff, like "I am/was on the security team" or the DA board? Looking at this again I see those types of things, as well as the D.o roles, don't get displayed. Is it useful to look at someone's profile and be able to see if they are a D.o webmaster, docs admin, etc.?

I think #2 is a good idea. Assoc-involvement, D.o roles, official team membership of chartered entities is an important part of a community persona.

where will these badges icons go?
In the community involvement list (the blue icons with words next to each)
or
the place where the DA multi color icons are?

If they are the icons on the community involvement list.. I find calling them badges confusing, since they would not go in the spot where the DA badges are.

It looks like the summary was updated to remove the "Badges" language, which I'm fine with. @YesCT, yes, these would be the icons with words next to them. The idea is to broaden the way we classify contributions, and go beyond code creation activity and into more community-oriented stuff, since that's also a huge part of what makes Drupal healthy.

@davidhernandez and @dddave, I agree that being a member of d.org teams is missing from the list; in fact @jcost made the same statement when we were discussing this issue. The challenge is that this could make the list of badges super long, I fear; would we want to list EVERY team someone could be on, or more "I serve on a Drupal working group" and ask someone to list that contribution in free text in the description of community involvement? And that selection would automatically come first in the list? I could see that working well. Thoughts?

Adding badges for serving on the DA board, the working groups, and participating in sprints.

Do by installation profiles we mean distributions? If so, let's use 'distributions' because that is used everywhere else.

I find "I contributed to Drupal issue queues" to be very vague. Does this mean at least one comment on any issue?

"I organize local and regional camps" - I'd suggest we use "I organize Drupal camps" instead.

In fact, maybe we should combine "I organize local user groups and meet ups" and "I organize local and regional camps" into "I organize Drupal events". This will be in line with the rest of "I ... Drupal events" things. While I can see the value in separating, there are also so many different types of events, that won't be covered by the 2 suggested types.

We could use "I run local Drupal user group" to cover that part separately.

From the list of "I... Drupal events" sponsor seems to be missing.

"I participate in discussions on Groups.Drupal.org and local meet ups" - This seems like a bit too much to list on a user profile.

A few missing ones I think are:
- "I review patches in the issue queue"
- something to acknowledge design/ux contributions. Here is relevant issue #2033497: Would like to create new contribution option: "I contributed to Drupal UX initiatives". The wording suggested there is "I contribute to Drupal UX initiatives"

Interesting fact is that we use past tense for some items and present for others. Let's double check if that makes sense. Do we want to acknowledge what already happened or ongoing work?

Even for something as big as a module. Contribution does not end once the module is created. There is ongoing maintenance, new releases, issue queue triage, etc.

Updated issue summary to include TVN's comments on August 17, 2014