Closed (outdated)
Project:
Drupal core
Version:
11.x-dev
Component:
documentation
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
28 Apr 2014 at 14:10 UTC
Updated:
7 Oct 2025 at 14:09 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
jhodgdonUm... What's a Libricon? Google and Wikipedia are not helpful. Oh, I see the parent issue. It's a font.
Where do you think this documentation should go? And is this a coding standard? I think it is; tagging/titling appropriately.
Comment #2
lewisnymanOops, It's a UI standard? That doesn't fall under documentation right?
Comment #3
jhodgdonI guess it's a UI standard -- are you asking me? I don't really know what this issue is about, actually, but it looks like a UI standard. Some thoughts on tags, etc.:
- If it's just for the Seven theme, you could change the component to that; if it's for more themes, then "documentation" or "other" or "theme system"?
- If it's a UI standard, it probably needs the "usability" tag.
Comment #4
draganerorTurned "Libricons" string into link in description above (for anyone who is curious).
Comment #5
Bojhan commentedThis should be documented in https://drupal.org/ui-standards
Comment #6
lewisnymanComment #7
jhodgdonUpdated issue summary with steps to be taken on this issue. (the next step would be to write up the section to be added to https://drupal.org/ui-standards as a comment here).
Comment #8
corbacho commentedWe are thinking to add a new SVG icon to Drupal core #2427213: Replace feed.png with feed.svg, following the Libricon structure. See the comment I'm linking
This will mean that not all the misc/icons/xxxxx (hex color) are designed by ry5n in his Libricon project.
(Personally I wouldn't like to add this restriction to SVG icons)
This would be important for documentation purposes.
Comment #9
corbacho commentedActually,
I think when this thread was open .. looks like libricons were going to be used in a "semantic way", with CSS classes.
Semantic Definition:
So you can use .druplicon-new class somewhere in your code.
But that's not the case anymore. Icons are being used directly
So, maybe we should remove the word "semantics" from the issue title ?
This change record is a bit related to the issue too: https://www.drupal.org/node/2384159
Comment #10
lewisnymanI think that the semantics should still be clear, even if the usage is different. We can open a new issue to create a set of reusable icon classes.
Comment #24
quietone commentedThere has been no activity here for 10 years.
Is this still needed? If confirmation that this is still needed isn't supplied this may be closed after three months.
Thanks!
Comment #25
smustgrave commentedI think this can be removed. I don't believe we use those fonts anymore?