Is drupal a CMS with a "small m" or a "big M"?
I give kudos to Adrian for trying to push forward a simpler conception of the template system, as a simpler system will lead to more templates.
But one thing that it seems never gets discussed about creating presentation in Drupal (or gets ignored) is how flexible the placement of content should be.
Drupal is not alone in this, as many cms's have taken this route. For the life of me I dont know why but they have.
Most cms's out of the box should not really be called cms's they should more aptly be called CSS's (Content Storage Systems), as they are much more likely to easily allow you to store your data in every concievalble heirarchy than they are likely to allow you to display/manage it with equal flexibility.
Why is it that most cms's have decided that chrono display of posts on the front page is good design or even usefull for the majority of users?
Why even have posts with authors, for most sites this has nothing to do with the management or placement of content.
Looking at the web at large I would say that the default display of most cms's out of the box mirrors the style of only maybe 1% of the pages on the internet if that. Most poeple simply dont build blogs or news scrolls.
The net is mostly populated with pages on a specific static subject or selling a specific static product. So why make the default of a CMS something that most people dont want to build?