Closed (fixed)
Project:
WordPress Migrate
Version:
8.x-3.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
18 Mar 2026 at 14:59 UTC
Updated:
4 Apr 2026 at 20:30 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #2
ressaFix title.
Comment #8
hongpong commentedThanks for reporting, ressa, I added a test to confirm it works. sapnil_biswas thanks for your first contribution and welcome to drupal.org . I have credited you on the issue.
However your function signature is different than mine, although it is quite similar. I am going to close the issue as fixed but if you can rebase your fix onto the new head 8.x-3.x we can take this additional test. It is OK to reopen the issue or attach it to a different one.
If you want to get further involved we have more issues we are trying to sort - see #2904990: Plan for wordpress_migrate 8.x-3.x beta release - rebasing and evaluating any of the ones discussed would be very helpful.
Comment #10
ressaVery impressive, super fast, thank you both! The solution works perfectly, and now the dev-version has great paths 🚀
(and HTML is imported and displayed as well, all fixed in the same day!)
Comment #11
sapnil_biswas commentedHi, just checking — I can see my name listed in the contribution record, but it seems the credit checkbox might not have been selected. Could you please confirm? Thanks!
Comment #12
ressa@sapnil_biswas: Thanks for your work here, it's really appreciated. I am sure it was an oversight from @hongpong, he is usually very good at granting credits. You can see the credit status here, and that no one was credited yet: https://new.drupal.org/contribution-record/11446411
Another thing: When you have pushed new code up, and it is ready for review, please change the issue Status to "Needs review", to make sure other users know some new code has arrived: https://www.drupal.org/docs/develop/issues/fields-and-other-parts-of-an-...
You can see all the Status'es in effect here: https://www.drupal.org/project/issues/wordpress_migrate
Comment #14
sapnil_biswas commentedHi @ressa, thanks a lot for the clarification and guidance!
I’m quite new here and still getting familiar with the workflow and processes, so this really helps. I’ll make sure to update the issue status to “Needs review” going forward when it’s ready.
Appreciate your support!
Comment #15
hongpong commentedHi sapnil_biswas, I tried to add your contribution record earlier but something went awry. Regarding this MR 50 there are a number of unrelated changes on here and it alters the function signature and name from what is already on head. I would suggest if you want the MR to be included please narrow it down to the minimum necessary, such as the additional test that you included, and rebase to what we already have on the 8.x-3.x head. Please feel free to reopen if this is taken care of. If you want to add additional code cleanups these should be moved to a separate issue. Appreciate your help! --dan