Support for Drupal 7 is ending on 5 January 2025—it’s time to migrate to Drupal 10! Learn about the many benefits of Drupal 10 and find migration tools in our resource center.
I just committed Features integration to the Drupal 6 version: http://drupal.org/cvs?commit=501020
We need to port it to Drupal 7. Patch is attached.
Comment | File | Size | Author |
---|---|---|---|
#5 | features-integration-nodeformcols-1063342-5.patch | 1.4 KB | scottrigby |
#3 | nodeformcols_features-1063342_3.patch | 1.04 KB | langworthy |
#2 | nodeformcols_features_2.patch | 1.04 KB | voxpelli |
#1 | nodeformcols_features_2.patch | 1.03 KB | voxpelli |
nodeformcols_features.patch | 582 bytes | voxpelli |
Comments
Comment #1
voxpelli CreditAttribution: voxpelli commentedThe implementation wasn't a 100% correct - here's a follow up patch to the above - both need to be applied.
Comment #2
voxpelli CreditAttribution: voxpelli commentedThere was a typo in the previous patch - fixed in this one.
Comment #3
langworthy CreditAttribution: langworthy commentedPatch from #2 rerolled using
--no-prefix
flag withgit diff
Comment #4
chromix CreditAttribution: chromix commentedI'm getting the following error:
WD php: Parameter 3 to nodeformcols_features_pipe_node_alter() expected to be a reference, value given [error]
in drupal/acquia-drupal-1.2.36/includes/common.inc on line 2892.
WD php: file_put_contents(sites/all/modules/features/my_feature/my_feature.views_default.inc): [error]
failed to open stream: Permission denied in drush/includes/drush.inc on line 1164.
Created module: my_feature in sites/all/modules/features/my_feature [ok]
Parameter 3 to nodeformcols_features_pipe_node_alter() expected to be a reference, value given in [warning]
includes/common.inc on line 2892.
file_put_contents(sites/all/modules/features/my_feature/my_feature.views_default.inc): failed to [warning]
open stream: Permission denied in drush/includes/drush.inc on line 1164.
Comment #5
scottrigbyWhy change $data to $export['features']['node']?
Also this patch drops $module_name (re #792472: Implement node type -> strongarm pipe for Features).
Maybe i'm missing why that needs to be there though?
Comment #6
voxpelli CreditAttribution: voxpelli commented@scottrigby: See #1078478: Multiple features and strongarm conflicts regarding $data - can you check your change against that patch as well?
Comment #7
asherry CreditAttribution: asherry at Aten Design Group commentedI'm going to close this as I'm no longer supporting this project, and it doesn't seem like the work on this was finished. Feel free to re-open if anybody is still actively working on this.