The clone module would then depend on them. That would allow other modules (like Cash Flow, which is my case) add a dependency on node_clone as well as clone, and Drush would then be able to download Node Clone properly. As it is, it'll either say that it can't enable node_clone or it will keep complaining that clone doesn't exist.
This isn't a functional change for the module. Other than the basic stuff in node_clone.info, the placeholder files could be empty.
I'm willing to roll the patch if it would be reviewed.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #5 | 1919168-5.patch | 459 bytes | pwolanin |
Comments
Comment #1
pwolanin commentedHow does this work for any other module where the project name and the module name are not identical?
Comment #2
wizonesolutionsI don't know. Is this something that has been raised, or that we should raise, upstream?
Comment #3
lolandese commentedComment #4
pwolanin commentedThis idea is probably the less annoying solution.
Can we make it a hidden module?
Comment #5
pwolanin commentedNot sure I love this, but please test and see how it works for you.
Comment #6
paulvandenburg commented#5 has been solving this problem for us for quite a while now, since #2989434: Use node_clone module instead of clone to be exact.
I'm for including this in the next release.