Comments

gabesullice created an issue. See original summary.

gabesullice’s picture

Title: Introduce concept of internal resource types » [META] Introduce concept of internal resource types
Priority: Normal » Major
Issue summary: View changes

Broke this out into subtasks because the patch was becoming unreadable. They can be committed independently or in a final combined patch.

Upgraded the task to Major because that's more accurate.

wim leers’s picture

Can we get a status update here? What remains to be done? What % is done?

e0ipso’s picture

Upgraded the task to Major because that's more accurate.

Totally agree. Thanks for doing tha @gabesullice.

I believe this is the most important point of focus along with test coverate (and any bug uncovered by tests). Do you guys feel the same way?

gabesullice’s picture

Issue summary: View changes

I'd put it around 77.77778% finished.

  • 2 of the largest issues (isInternal and related resource types) are committed. That's 2/5ths of the meta-issue, but half the battle. [50% of effort/0.00000% remaining]
  • Of the 3 remaining, one is nearly RTBC with only nits remaining (internal resource inclusion) [2.22222% remaining]
  • One will be a very small clean-up issue (links to internal) [4.99% remaining]
  • Only one is actively being worked on/discussed in detail (providing relationship routes) [15.01% remaining]

These are just some rough estimates, so please don't quote me on it.

wim leers’s picture

😂 Those are the most ridiculously over-the-top precise "rough estimates" I've ever seen, nice one :P

So, TL;DR = there are 3 issues left.

wim leers’s picture

wim leers’s picture

#2939705: Do not include internal resource types under `include` was just re-committed, after it was reverted shortly after getting committed.

wim leers’s picture

wim leers’s picture

Status: Active » Fixed
wim leers’s picture

Category: Feature request » Plan

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.