Active
Project:
Image Assist
Version:
6.x-2.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
15 Feb 2007 at 13:02 UTC
Updated:
25 Apr 2011 at 19:31 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
ñull commentedattached a patch that makes the top frame a bit higher when in off-line mode
Comment #2
ñull commentedComment #3
mlsamuelson commentedIn Firefox 2.0 the patch works great. In IE 6 the frame needed a few more rows. Going from 60 to 70 did the trick. Patch attached. (This is my first patch, so any feedback on how the patch works would be appreciated.)
I'm unable to test with IE 7 in my current location, so feedback on that would be helpful.
I also noticed the offline message causing the same problem in the 5.x branch. I will submit an issue and patch for that.
mlsamuelson
Comment #4
mlsamuelson commentedOur would it be better to create the new issue and patch for Head? I'm not sure what the preferred route would be.
mlsamuelson
Comment #5
ñull commentedOK. This is still very bothering when you prepare a site that is off-line. I suggest another (better?) approach.
Could someone come up with a change in the CSS somewhere to turn off the
<div class="messages status">withdisplay:none;? I gave it a try myself but I did not manage to find the right one yet that would accomplish it. There seem to be so many CSS files that influence it that I lost track.Comment #6
zoo33 commentedYes, see if you can make it disappear by adding
display: noneto img_assist.css. I would definitely prefer that approach to resizing the frame. (I don't suppose you'd like to rewrite Image assist so that it doesn't use frames? That would be another option, just a little more work...)I don't personally work with content while in offline mode but I guess if you do this would be a nice improvement.
Comment #7
sunI think this can be solved easily. Please test attached patch.
Comment #8
sunIf this patch won't be tested within the next 7 days, this issue will be marked as won't fix.
Comment #9
sunFeel free to re-open this issue if you want to provide test results.
Comment #10
jasoncd commentedI applied the patch manually (Windows) and it works great. Tested using Firefox 3.5.
Comment #11
jasoncd commentedComment #12
jasoncd commentedSigh. Forgot to note that I am running 6.x-2.0-alpha4, not the 5.x that was reported by the com2. Obviously the line numbers no longer match up.
Comment #13
sunThanks for reporting, reviewing, and testing! Committed to all 2.x and 3.x branches.
A new development snapshot will be available within the next 12 hours. This improvement will be available in the next official release.
Comment #15
ñull commentedWould be nice when there is finally a release version that fixes this annoying bug (although it is marked as a feature). We are in 2011 now and no release was possible since August 2009?