Right now if you do a google search for "drupal annotate.js" the first result is a packging whitelist node:

https://drupal.org/node/1904824

This is silly and totally confusing. Heck, it took me ten minutes to figure out what it was. Is there any reason these can't just all be unpublished? They're for internal use only.

Comments

drumm’s picture

drumm
he/him
Location NY, US
commented
Title: Unpublish packaging whitelist nodes » Hide/explain packaging whitelist nodes

This View, https://drupal.org/packaging-whitelist, only shows published nodes. I think we'll want to keep that, since it is a relatively-normal setup. And we won't have to worry about potential permissions-related problems.

For search results, we recently installed metatag for #2233753: Add ability for webmasters to flag posts no-index, no follow . We can configure the whitelist content type to "Prevent search engines from indexing this page."

If someone does land on the page, drupalorg could insert an explanation, and link to https://drupal.org/packaging-whitelist.

gdd’s picture

gdd
he/him
Primary language English
Location Portland, OR
commented

Ah I hadn't realized about the public view of whitelisted libraries. The proposed solution makes good sense. Thanks!

damienmckenna’s picture

damienmckenna
Location TN, USA
commented
Related issues: +#2402211: META: Add appropriate meta tags to drupal.org for all entities
drumm’s picture

drumm
he/him
Location NY, US
commented
Status: Active » Closed (outdated)
Related issues: +#3388668: Dismantle code which supported drush make distribution packaging

These nodes are actually now all deleted with #3388668: Dismantle code which supported drush make distribution packaging