Few months ago I posted similar issue to WB : 2750365; however, based on this comment CM is going to be completely redesigned. Until that happens, moderation states with same name remains unclear.
Moderation state transition list page looks much better than the one in WBM, but on the other hand more confusing.
Current CM list page:

Proposed solution:

| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #22 | 2804873_22.patch | 7.79 KB | pericxc |
| #22 | interdiff_22.txt | 2.99 KB | pericxc |
| #20 | 2804873.png | 117.35 KB | lomasr |
| Screen Shot 2016-09-22 at 1.00.02 PM.png | 97.45 KB | pericxc | |
| Screen Shot 2016-09-22 at 1.06.56 PM.png | 88.59 KB | pericxc |
Comments
Comment #2
jhedstromComment #3
pericxc commentedComment #5
pericxc commentedComment #6
jhedstromIt would be good to get some of the other folks that helped review #2750365: Permissions: moderation states with the same name is unclear for user to assign to a role to chime in here as well.
Some code feedback.
This is off a bit since this trait deals with unique and non-unique. Perhaps "Provides a trait for getting labels."
I'm not sure traits can use
{@inheritdoc}...Tiny nitpick, how about something more specific than
$arg?Let's add code comments clarifying why we don't need a unique label here.
And here too.
Comment #7
pericxc commentedComment #8
jhedstromI think since displaying the machine name can be seen as unfriendly, perhaps this patch can be updated to only display the machine name if the site in question has duplicate labels?
Comment #9
pericxc commentedComment #11
pericxc commentedComment #12
pericxc commentedComment #14
pericxc commentedComment #16
pericxc commentedComment #18
pericxc commentedComment #20
lomasr commentedApplied the patch #5 worked cleanly but cant see the machine name added. Do I need to Add moderation. Please see screenshot.
Comment #21
pericxc commentedhi @lomasr machine_name will appear ONLY for duplicate labels. In order to see the results, create one more Draft state ( or published).
Comment #22
pericxc commentedComment #23
alexpottThis is solved by #2779647: Add a workflow component, ui module, and implement it in content moderation
Comment #24
sam152 commentedBetter status given the issue linked in #23?