The ImageLightbox module provides a user-friendly solution for presenting images through a lightbox interface. With minimal configuration requirements, users can effortlessly customize the appearance of the lightbox to suit their preferences directly within the field formatter settings.

Project page

https://www.drupal.org/project/imagelightbox

Comments

piridium created an issue. See original summary.

vishal.kadam’s picture

Thank you for applying!

Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review gives some hints for a smoother review.

The important notes are the following.

  • If you have not done it yet, you should run phpcs --standard=Drupal,DrupalPractice on the project, which alone fixes most of what reviewers would report.
  • For the time this application is open, only your commits are allowed.
  • The purpose of this application is giving you a new drupal.org role that allows you to opt projects into security advisory coverage, either projects you already created, or projects you will create. The project status will not be changed by this application; once this application is closed, you will be able to change the project status from Not covered to Opt into security advisory coverage. This is possible only 14 days after the project is created.
    Keep in mind that once the project is opted into security advisory coverage, only Security Team members may change coverage.
  • Only the person who created the application will get the permission to opt projects into security advisory coverage. No other person will get the same permission from the same application; that applies also to co-maintainers/maintainers of the project used for the application.
  • We only accept an application per user. If you change your mind about the project to use for this application, or it is necessary to use a different project for the application, please update the issue summary with the link to the correct project and the issue title with the project name and the branch to review.

To the reviewers

Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications, Application workflow, What to cover in an application review, and Tools to use for reviews.

The important notes are the following.

  • It is preferable to wait for a project moderator before posting the first comment on newly created applications. Project moderators will do some preliminary checks that are necessary before any change on the project files is suggested.
  • Reviewers should show the output of a CLI tool only once per application.
  • It may be best to have the applicant fix things before further review.

For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues.

vishal.kadam’s picture

Status: Needs review » Needs work

For these applications, we need a project where, in at least the branch used for the application, most of the commits (if not all the commits) have been done from the person who applied.

The purpose of these applications is reviewing a project to understand what the person who applies understands about writing secure code that follows the Drupal coding standards and correctly uses the Drupal API. We do not review a project to understand what the project maintainers as a group understands about those topics.

This application can only continue with another project where most of the commits (and preferable all the commits) have been done by the piridium.

piridium’s picture

I understand the consideration that the review process aims to understand the competencies of the applicant. However, solely focusing on the commit count strikes me as somewhat superficial. For the past 28 months, nearly all commits have been made by the applicant, and during this time, a significant portion of the module has been rewritten. Is there a possibility for the code and contributions of the applicant to be evaluated?

piridium’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
rushikesh raval’s picture

Priority: Normal » Critical

I am changing the issue priority as per issue priorities.

avpaderno’s picture

Priority: Critical » Normal
Status: Needs review » Needs work
Issue tags: +PAreview: security
  • The following points are just a start and don't necessarily encompass all the changes that may be necessary
  • A specific point may just be an example and may apply in other places
  • A review is about code that doesn't follow the coding standards, contains possible security issues, or does not correctly use the Drupal API; the single points are not ordered, not even by importance

imagelightbox.module

    $output .= '<p>' . (string) new TranslatableMarkup('<a href="@GIT"> git.drupalcode.org</a>', [
      '@GIT' => 'https://git.drupalcode.org/project/imagelightbox',
    ]) . '</p>';

The correct placeholder for URLs starts with :. It must also be wrapped on double quotation marks, as reported on FormattableMarkup::placeholderFormat().

:variable: Return value is escaped with \Drupal\Component\Utility\Html::escape() and filtered for dangerous protocols using UrlHelper::stripDangerousProtocols(). Use this when using the "href" attribute, ensuring the attribute value is always wrapped in quotes

src/Plugin/Field/FieldFormatter/ImagelightboxFormatter.php

The \Drupal\image\Plugin\Field\FieldFormatter\ImageFormatter class is not part of the public API and cannot be used as parent class for classes implemented by a contributed module, differently from \Drupal\image\Plugin\Field\FieldFormatter\ImageFormatterBase which is a base class and therefore part of the public API.

vishal.kadam’s picture

Priority: Normal » Minor

I am changing priority as per Issue priorities.

vishal.kadam’s picture

Status: Needs work » Closed (won't fix)

This thread has been idle, in the Needs work state with no activity for several months. Therefore, I am assuming that you are no longer pursuing this application, and I marked it as Closed (won't fix).

If this is incorrect, and you are still pursuing this application, then please feel free to re-open it and set the issue status to Needs work or Needs review, depending on the current status of your code.

avpaderno’s picture

Status: Closed (won't fix) » Needs work

Let's keep this application open for longer.

avpaderno’s picture

Status: Needs work » Closed (won't fix)

This thread has been idle, in the Needs work state with no activity for more than eight months; the application has been created more than 11 months ago. Therefore, I marked it as Closed (won't fix).

If this is incorrect, and you are still pursuing this application, please feel free to re-open it and set the issue status to Needs work or Needs review, depending on the current status of your code.

Now that this issue is closed, please review the contribution record.

As a contributor, attribute any organization helped you, or if you volunteered your own time.

Maintainers, please credit people who helped resolve this issue.