Create a logo that is 512x512 square dimension in PNG format without animations. Suggested file size should be 10k or less. Use a lossy image tool (such as pngquant) to reduce file size while keeping the image quality at around 80%.
MAINTAINERS: The logo should be added to the root folder of the repo, and be named logo.png. This must be present on your project’s default branch. This is the logo that will be displayed on the cards in the Project Browser grid and list views.
If you previously added a logo as the first image in the Images field on your project page, please remove it. Project Browser will no longer be using the first image as the logo.
Link to module
https://www.drupal.org/project/search_api_attachments
Proposed Resolution (in attachments)
Proposal 1: a more complex drop showing the advanced character

Proposal 2: a flat logo visualizing complex search

| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #22 | search_api_attachments_preview_js.png | 47.96 KB | lostcarpark |
| #22 | search_api_attachments_js.png | 7.54 KB | lostcarpark |
| #18 | search_api_attachments_preview_uv2_dark.png | 46.07 KB | lostcarpark |
| #17 | search-api-attachment-logo-retouch.png | 6.12 KB | urvashi_vora |
| #16 | search_api_attachments_comparison.png | 170.33 KB | lostcarpark |
Comments
Comment #2
stefvanlooveren commentedComment #3
stefvanlooveren commentedComment #4
leslieg commentedComment #5
leslieg commentedTagged as Novice
We, the mentoring team, are triaging issues for first time contributors at DrupalCon Lille and I think this is a good issue for the contribution day.
We are reserving this issue so please don't work on this issue if you are not at DrupalCon Lille. You can continue the work when the event is over.
Comment #6
amourowI'm reviewing the logo on the contrib day of Lille 2023
Comment #7
amourowThe proposal 2 looks like a better candidate to move forward.
We need to scale up the image to 512px and reduce the file size further. Change the gradient shadow should reduce physical size of the image.
Comment #8
urvashi_vora commentedI tried re-designing it.
Please review. Thanks
Comment #9
lostcarpark commentedAdded link to module
Comment #10
lostcarpark commentedNice work, urvashi_vora.
I have prepared a preview:
I think this captures the essence of the original proposal, but meets the image and file size requirements.
Just one thing. The image is currently on a white background. I think the background for this logo would be better transparent.
Comment #11
lostcarpark commentedMoving back to needs work. I think if the image from #8 was redone with a transparent background, it would be perfect.
Comment #12
urvashi_vora commentedHi @lostcarpark,
Please review.
Thanks
Comment #13
lostcarpark commentedThanks @urvashi_vora,
I think all that's needed is to make the white background from #8 with transparency. The logo in #12 adds a thick white band, which makes the actual logo quite a bit smaller.
Could you try again?
Comment #14
urvashi_vora commentedThat white band was actually present in #8. Let me see what I can do to remove it.
Comment #15
urvashi_vora commentedHi @lostcarpark,
That's all I was able to do to remove the white band.
Please review.
Thanks
Comment #16
lostcarpark commentedThe logo in #15 is an improvement, but it's still a little shrunk from #8.
I've put together a side by side comparison.
The first 3 panels show #8, #12 and #15 side by side.
Panel 4 shows #8 and #12 superimposed (with opacity turned down so you can see both).
Panel 5 shows #8 and #15 superimposed. You can see the outline of #8 around the lower half of #15.
#15 is still slightly smaller than #8 was. The border around the edges seems bigger than it needs to be.
If it could be made just a little bigger, it would be perfect.
Thanks again!
Comment #17
urvashi_vora commentedHi @lostcarpark,
Please review. I have tried to remove the background from the #8 logo. And also reduced the size of image.
Thanks
Comment #18
lostcarpark commented#17 looks great to me.
I could do a new preview, but it would look exactly like #10.
So here's a preview showing how it currently looks in Gin theme, dark mode. There are some problems, but they aren't related to how it shows the transparency of the logo on the dark background.
I think it looks great on both dark and light background (the end of the magnifier handle does get a bit lost, but I don't think that detracts from the logo). I've confirmed it is 512x512 pixels, and the file size is under 10K.
I'm happy to recommend for RTBC.
Comment #19
urvashi_vora commentedThanks @lostcarpark.
Comment #20
bramdriesenI think the logo in 2 looks a lot more modern as proposal 1.
However, due to the many edits on the PNG file over and over instead of source file (psd or whatever), the image has lost quite a lot of quality (you can clearly see it you open the first one next to the last one and zoom in a bit). Also, the glass in the magnifier glass itself is off centre, which my brain doesn't like 😅 it's quite noticeable in the preview.
Comment #21
lostcarpark commentedGood point @BramDriesen.
@urvashi_vora, what did you use to draw the image. Is the original in a vector format?
Comment #22
lostcarpark commentedI've redrawn @urvashi_vora's version as a vector, exported as PNG, and compressed to under 10K.
Here's a preview of this version.
@BramDriesen, I think the off-centre part is meant to be a reflection in the magnifier glass. I've tweaked it to be a little more centred. I could adjust further if it still bothers you. I also added a bit of a highlight to the handle to give it a little more visibility on dark backgrounds.
Let me know what you think of this one.
Comment #23
urvashi_vora commented@lostcarpark, I used canva to redraw the proposed logo, as we were not having the original logo, so it was not possible to remove the shadow. Thus, I recreated it.
However, the logo you provided, looks good to me.
As of now, setting it to Needs Review.
Comment #24
bramdriesenLooks better and a lot less noticeable! Thanks 🙏 RTBC+1
Comment #25
bramdriesenComment #26
lostcarpark commentedThanks everyone!
Comment #27
amourowGreat work! @lotscarpark
Comment #28
chrisfromredfinfiled upstream issue with suggestions
https://www.drupal.org/project/search_api_attachments/issues/3627290