Remove D8 branding from D9 status report

I removed the old logod8-logo.svg and added the new one drupal-evergreen-logo.svg.
I replaced all instances that the old logo appeared with the new one.

Discussion about Drupal evergreen logo's license can be found here: #3134326: Adopt the 2020 (evergreen) Drupal logo in Drupal core

Screenshot after this patch applied:

My understanding is this would need a switch resolution of #3134326: Adopt the 2020 (evergreen) Drupal logo in Drupal core (the legal parts) first?

Working on a usage policy for brand elements that can be included in core, so that we can make this change and update the new brand elements. Hope to have that policy ready tomorrow.

See #3134326: Adopt the 2020 (evergreen) Drupal logo in Drupal core

@dww, re:

Do we really want duplicate copies of the evergreen svg in each core (admin) theme? Why not put it in core/misc or something and have all the admin themes re-use the same copy?

I think that would be a question for @lauriii, I just kept the file structure the way it is.

Tested the patch #4 on theme seven and claro. It looks great.

@gisle in #3134326: Adopt the 2020 (evergreen) Drupal logo in Drupal core suggests to ship the logo in a distinct directory with a license.txt or license.md file that points to the https://www.drupal.org/about/media-kit/copyright-and-trademark URL (possibly not the final URL). I think that would only be practical if the file would indeed only appear once in core for this purpose at least and not in every single theme.

Should the 9.0 logo be used in the 9.0.x branch to celebrate the release of Drupal 9, especially?

@jungle: I don' think that would make sense in the context of this issue, the version number is displayed right alongside it. If this image would be used, we would need to change it in each minor branch (there is already 9.1 and 9.0 open).

The following changes were made:

• Latest changes from fixed evergreen logo (https://www.drupal.org/about/media-kit/logos)
• Class name in template was changed to system-status-general-info__item-icon--drupal
• Logo file was removed from theme directories and moved to 1 share file at core/misc/logo/drupal-evergreen-logo.svg
• Added license.txt file, that should be updated with the right content.

@todo: finalize the content of license.txt

#14, #15, thanks for disagreement! :)

Logo file was removed from theme directories and moved to 1 share file at core/misc/logo/drupal-evergreen-logo.svg

Can we remove evergreen from the filename? Change it to core/misc/logo/drupal-logo.svg or core/misc/logo/drupal.svg?

As a non-native English speaker, It's my first time to know the word evergreen when the new logo released, never know it before. And before checking the dictionary and got the explanation from @Gábor Hojtsy on slack, at first glance, I thought it's the name of the new logo -- a name similar to Druplicon. 🤦

I do not think I am the only one got confused :p

In the official Drupal logos pack file it is called Evergreen Logo.
I'll be happy to change it if a different name would be better.

@jungle agreeing to your point,

As a non-native English speaker, It's my first time to know the word evergreen when the new logo released, never know it before.

It should be changed back to drupal-logo.svg, drupal.svg or to some other better name.

Can we change the file name to d9-evergreen-logo.svg or drupal9-logo.svg?

@dww, Thanks for the quick response.

Can we remove evergreen from the name of the file? In my view, it should be changed to drupal-logo.svg.

Re #20, well, a good exmple of misunderstanding evergreen, no offense :)

evergreen === long live/forever, see similar replies in #14 and #15.

Both d9-evergreen-logo.svg or drupal9-logo.svg are inapplicable here, to me.

I am adding a patch here with the name drupal-logo.svg.

Keeping the issue status to needs work till the name is confirmed or new suggestion pops up.

Adding the patch for the testing.

Thanks!

Drupal logo is fine. Drupal has the wordmark, the (software) logo and the mascot (Druplicon). So we can just call this the logo :) Looks like otherwise as well.

Actually we can use sensible text that is not a problem if we don't come around to change it later. :) Also referencing it from COPYRIGHT.txt. Now I am not eligible to RTBC it though.

Nice, glad to see this sorted!

I find myself counting relative path segments in url() again... flashbacks to the theme decoupling work we did 4-5 months ago. I confirmed that only Seven and Claro have this branding with the D8 logo to begin with.

+++ b/core/COPYRIGHT.txt
@@ -57,3 +57,8 @@ PHP
+  Drupal brand materials under core/misc/logo have a dedicated license,
+  see core/misc/logo/LICENSE.txt

Comma splice, missing a period, and also wrapping too early ("see" can go on the previous line). So all together:

Drupal brand materials under core/misc/logo have a dedicated license. See
core/misc/logo/LICENSE.txt.

Additionally, I'd like to have signoff from someone in legal or at the DA before committing this. Calling that a "subsystem" maintainer for lack of a better term. :) I'll ask in a DA channel.

+++ b/core/misc/logo/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Files in this directory do not fall under the GNU General Public License.
+See https://www.drupal.org/about/media-kit/copyright-and-trademark for
+license terms.

One more similar to #29. Even without moving See to the previous line, license should be.

Additionally, I'd like to have signoff from someone in legal or at the DA before committing this. Calling that a "subsystem" maintainer for lack of a better term. :) I'll ask in a DA channel.

Consider it approved from your friendly neighborhood DA representative, as well as per Dries.

Note that in our other issue about drafting this language it was suggested to make the canonical language the text on Drupal.org itself so that additional tweaks can be easily made.

Therefore a suggested license.txt like @jungle'sabove should work.

Alternately, if we prefer to be extra safe, we could include the full text of the Drupal.org copyright and trademark policy for brand materials page, with a note at the top making it clear that the most current and official canonical version resides on D.O

The text is good and resolves @xjm's concerns as well which I agree with. Also @hestenet signed off.

Yay! Glad to see us fixing this before RC (and in a way that meets our licensing needs without any real overhead for core). No egg on our face branding it as D8. And in some ways I'm glad we had this bug because this is at least one thing in the UI that's new, even though we weren't ready to turn on new themes etc.

Since this is changes to the internal themes, deleting the old logo is OK.

Committed to 9.1.x and cherry-picked to 9.0.x. Thanks!