Problem/Motivation

https://www.drupal.org/u/hass is violating the CoC in #2611306: [realname] Real Name.
Willingly he is providing wrong information on the module he happens to be maintainer of.
Note that it is in the Drupal 8 Contrib Porting Tracker, not his own project.

Proposed resolution

Remove the edit privilege for https://www.drupal.org/u/hass on #2611306: [realname] Real Name

Remaining tasks

Assessment of https://www.drupal.org/u/hass regarding:
- appropriate as maintainer
- appropriate as contributor
- appropriate as community member

User interface changes

NA

API changes

NA

Data model changes

NA

Original report by [mmjvb]

NA

Comments

mmjvb created an issue. See original summary.

hass’s picture

Suggest deleting/blocking user mmjvb from d.o has he does not respect project maintainer decisions. I do not need the stupid banner on project home. Give me a chance to unsubscribe the project from the banner and the case can stay in what ever status it want.

https://www.drupal.org/node/2611306#comment-12069648

mmjvb’s picture

@hass Obviously, it is not my behavior that is in violation, yours is!

@all
So, there is absolutely no reason for deleting/blocking me. Suggest to scan this queue for both of us. Then you can decide who needs to be blocked!
See https://www.drupal.org/node/2578191#comment-12065170

dddave’s picture

Status: Active » Closed (won't fix)

@hass
Please, for your own sake stop interacting with mmjvb. I understand where you are coming from but you are way out there with your reaction.

@mmjvb
I have no clue what you are trying to achieve here and in other issues with your constant attempts to police the tracker issue queue. Do you think your efforts are helping and/or appreciated? If you want to move a project along provide code or money or help otherwise but don't start random turf wars. Thanks!
If for whatever reason you think it is in any way fruitful to follow this path please direct you energy to the Community Working Group as they are already looking into this.

Issues like this help exactly nobody.

mmjvb’s picture

@ddave Thank you very much for putting an end to this ridiculous situation. Obviously, I disagree with the way you did. Hopefully, you'll realize your mistake and correct it appropriately.

@mmjvb
I have no clue what you are trying to achieve here and in other issues with your constant attempts to police the tracker issue queue.

Sorry to hear that this issue is actually beyond your comprehension, it shows. No insult intended, just stating the facts. To avoid such mistakes in the future you might want to consult those that do understand!
You must have missed this:

In this project the status 'Needs review' reflects the actual status of your module, as determined by you in your project.
See https://www.drupal.org/project/contrib_tracker#statuses for correct usage of the status in this project.

You might want to have look at https://www.drupal.org/node/2578191#comment-12065170, you are not the only one having a problem with understanding how this project works.

To me that is the exact same situation. Your decision here is opposite to what is decided there. Am I missing something? These situations are not the same? Please tell me what is different!

Do you think your efforts are helping and/or appreciated?

You are not alone, there are members in this community that don't understand. Fortunately, there are also people that do. And yes, they informed me, the work is appreciated.

If you want to move a project along provide code or money or help otherwise but don't start random turf wars.

Consider this remark very disrespectful, may I remind of

of gdemet: The Drupal Community Working Group has received multiple incident reports about this thread. We would ask all participants to abide by the Drupal Code of Conduct (https://www.drupal.org/dcoc) when engaging with others, in particular the following:

Be respectful.
The Drupal community and its members treat one another with respect. Everyone can make a valuable contribution to Drupal. We may not always agree, but disagreement is no excuse for poor behavior and poor manners.

Consider your remark in violation of CoC.
Just to make it perfectly clear, there is only one person that determines my contribution, that person is me! As mentioned by gdemet such remarks are disrespectful. AFAIK the CoC also applies to webmaster, correct me when that is not the case!

If for whatever reason you think it is in any way fruitful to follow this path please direct you energy to the Community Working Group as they are already looking into this.

Is that your interpretation of that post of gdemet? Haven't heard from the CWG, looking forward to their decision. Trust they will decide to correct your mistake, when they don't I'll conform but disagree with their decision. A matter of: came for the code, left because of certain members of the community.

Issues like this help exactly nobody.

Absolutely agree, your decision is helping only one person.
Can't wait for this insubordination to be stopped.

dddave’s picture

Just for the sake of information: The request you made in the OP is not enforcable. We cannot disallow single users to comment on or edit certain nodes.

avpaderno’s picture