This module integrates the Liquid Slider 2 library (http://liquidslider.com/) as a Views display handler.
It is lightweight and has options support in a form of JSON settings textarea so any appropriate settings can be taken from library documentation and used in views handler settings form.
The D7 versions supports custon skins, D8 version also but in a more simple way - by using a theme template and / or preprocess function.
Project page: https://www.drupal.org/sandbox/graber/2729947
Clone commands:
D8:
git clone --branch 8.x-1.x https://git.drupal.org/sandbox/Graber/2729947.git liquid_slider
cd liquid_slider
Comments
Comment #2
graber commentedComment #3
arun ak commentedHi Graber,
Please see my comments below.
Automated Review
Best practice issues identified by pareview.sh.
http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpsgitdrupalorgsandboxgraber2729947git
Note that perfect adherence to Drupal Coding Standard is NOT a reason to block an application, except for total disregard of them. However, modules should follow them as closely as possible.
Manual Review
found
I am using Views 3.
The starred items (*) are fairly big issues and warrant going back to Needs Work. Items marked with a plus sign (+) are important and should be addressed before a stable project release. The rest of the comments in the code walkthrough are recommendations.
If added, please don't remove the security tag, we keep that for statistics and to show examples of security problems.
This review uses the Project Application Review Template.
Thanks,
ARUN AK
Comment #4
graber commentedComment #5
PA robot commentedProject 1: https://www.drupal.org/node/2795077
Project 2: https://www.drupal.org/node/2796389
As successful completion of the project application process results in the applicant being granted the 'Create Full Projects' permission, there is no need to take multiple applications through the process. Once the first application has been successfully approved, then the applicant can promote other projects without review. Because of this, posting multiple applications is not necessary, and results in additional workload for reviewers ... which in turn results in longer wait times for everyone in the queue. With this in mind, your secondary applications have been marked as 'closed(duplicate)', with only one application left open (chosen at random).
If you prefer that we proceed through this review process with a different application than the one which was left open, then feel free to close the 'open' application as a duplicate, and re-open one of the project applications which had been closed.
I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.
Comment #6
avpadernoComment #7
avpaderno