Update to latest Panelizer

I'm debating whether this should be two seperate issues... If one of these modules is in better shape than the other, we might get this in quicker. FYI, I've just started testing the latest Panelizer -dev and things are looking mostly good! I RTBC'd #2445769: Unable to clone a display for Damien McKenna.

I'm going to make this issue just about Panelizer, so we can work on it seperately from FPP which I created a new issue for:

#2483265: Update to latest Fieldable Panels Panes (FPP)

@HaiNguyen007: Thanks for the patch!

1. +++ b/panopoly_core.make
   @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ projects[panels][patch][2448825] = https://www.drupal.org/files/issues/panels-ex
   +projects[panelizer][download][url] = git://git.drupal.org/project/panelizer.git
   

   It isn't necessary to specify this for a Git repo on Drupal.org. You can just omit this line.

2. +++ b/panopoly_core.make
   @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ projects[panels][patch][2448825] = https://www.drupal.org/files/issues/panels-ex
   +projects[panelizer][download][revision] = cbc19ad09e683b06a817a920228be5a0e8595143
   

   We only put the first 7 characters of Git revision hashes in our .make files. Can you please remove the extra characters!

   Also, please specify projects[panelizer][download][branch] too. Thanks!

I've started a run on Travis to how it does with our automated tests:

https://travis-ci.org/panopoly/panopoly/builds/61310443

@mglaman: Thanks!

+++ b/panopoly_core.make
@@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ projects[panels][patch][2448825] = https://www.drupal.org/files/issues/panels-ex
-projects[panelizer][version] = 3.1

One thing I didn't notice before: we usually set the version to something like "3.x-dev". I'm actually not sure if that's necessary or even does anything, but we do it everywhere else, so I'd like to here as well for consistency.

Sweet, thanks! I kicked off a new build on Travis with the new patches:

https://travis-ci.org/panopoly/panopoly/builds/61358165

@HaiNguyen007: Thanks for your enthusiasm! :-) However, in the future, please mark patches as 'hidden' if they aren't intended to be committed - it makes it difficult to for people to see which patches they should be testing and reviewing and could slow down our progress in getting it committed.

Here's a new Travis build with the latest patches, but this time running the upgrade tests:

https://travis-ci.org/panopoly/panopoly/builds/63026196

Since this appears to be working, I'm not sure what the criteria for commit should be... Ideally, we wouldn't release on a -dev version, but what can we do to help get the next Panelizer release out?

beginner question: I untick "Display" for hiding patch is correct or not?

Yep, that's correct!

@mpotter: Thanks! However, you're patch is missing critical other changes from the patch on #9, which is the last real patch for panopoly_core -- the ones from HaiNguyen007 were just for his own personal use in his .make files. I tried to make that clear by asking him to hide them, but maybe in the future I'll ask people to create seperate issues for that purpose.

Here is a re-roll of the patch from #9, updated to the last revision hash!

Note: both the patches (for panopoly_core and panopoly_user) are required for the tests to pass (or they did pass, back in #11

EDIT: Here's the Travis build: https://travis-ci.org/panopoly/panopoly/builds/65586645

It just occurred to me that if panopoly_core and panopoly_users need a drush fu then maybe we should see if panopoly_pages and panopoly_test (which both define content types using Panelizer) need to be updated too! Added a TODO to the issue summary. It's possible no changes are needed, but we should be sure to check it out...

We should fix this issue before updating to the latest Panelizer:

#2513996: Hide display of fields on all view modes that are panelized

Added to the TODO in the issue summary as well.

Thanks, @mpotter!

I put that in the issue summary, and I'm going to mark this issue as postponed on:

#2513996: Hide display of fields on all view modes that are panelized
#2514068: Error editing user Panelizer content with revisions

We have a separate issue for updating to the -beta of UUID: #2597275: Update UUID to version 1.1

This patch should focus only on updating Panelizer with the current version of UUID, there's a separate set of issues concerns for UUID that need to be worked out. Tying them together will just slow this down.

Here's a test build on Travis of the latest patch:

https://travis-ci.org/panopoly/panopoly/jobs/141067636

What goes in that variable? Maybe we want it in the Feature? We definitely Panelize that taxonomy vocabulary...

Here's an updated build anyway, just to see what happens:

https://travis-ci.org/panopoly/panopoly/jobs/141119998

That last build on Travis passed! At this point, it's just a question for me if we should really be excluding that variable, or if we should instead be putting it into the Feature per my question in #41

Thanks, Damien! That looks great. :-) I'm running the tests on Travis again:

https://travis-ci.org/panopoly/panopoly/builds/142441844

We should probably also take this opportunity to rebuild the panopoly_pages and panopoly_users features as well, since they both include Panelizer configurations. I expect the changes to be equally simple! I'll try to get to this later if no one beats me to it.

The last patch didn't pass. :-(

Here's an attempt to fix that, and also regenerate the features for panopoly_pages and panopoly_users!

EDIT: Here's the Travis build: https://travis-ci.org/panopoly/panopoly/builds/153003630

Ah, that build is going to fail because we moved the 'taxonomy' dependency in panopoly_core. I'm so glad we added that test, because we would have just broken all child distributions!

Here's a new patch.

EDIT: Here's the build on Travis: https://travis-ci.org/panopoly/panopoly/builds/153005570

The previous test failures are gone! There was a failure, but it looks like a gremlin - I'm re-running the job to be sure.

@chrisgross: I'm going to do the Panels and Panelizer update as part of a follow-up issue, I'll make it in a moment

Tests finally passed! Committed :-)

@chrisgross: Here's the follow-up issue #2785825: Update Panels and Panelizer for SA-CONTRIB-2016-047 and SA-CONTRIB-2016-048