Tis provides a more versatile "expert mode" formatter for the useful Double Field module, giving precise control over HTML tags and attributes. Double field is very good for presenting information as pairs of terms and definitions, e.g. technical specifications, where you do not know how many attributes you wish to describe. Using Display Suite Extras or Fences you can control the HTML around the field items, but have to rely on one the default formatters for the inner HTML or write custom theme function in your theme's template.php file. This module removes the need for a theme function in template.php or custom templates.

Inspiration

The Double Field module fulfils an essential requirement for many projects, enabling editors to enter miscellaneous content in pairs of terms and descriptions, e.g. for details, attributes or specifications. Although Double Field itself comes with a set of formatters, none give the administrator full control over the rendered HTML, especially when seeking to comply with strict requirements for design, search engine optimisation, semantic markup and accessibility. The module only requires Double Field, but is ideally used with Display Suite and Display Suite Extras or Fences allowing full control over field templates. Also implemented are all options available in the default formatter for this field type.

How it differs from other modules

Double Field is a rather niche module, though well maintained for a discerning audience and I could not find another module that provide a custom formatter for it. In earlier projects, e.g. at http://www.london.ac.uk, I had implemented a theme hook to meet requirements. However, this can become unmaintainable as requirements and designs evolve. Administrators just want a simple tool to customise markup without asking a developer to edit a php file.

Standards

The module implements documented field hooks and where practical places detailed implementation in a separate file to minimise load when the formatter is not used.

CommentFileSizeAuthor
doublefield_formatter-7.1.tgz4.31 KBNeil Gardner
Support from Acquia helps fund testing for Drupal Acquia logo

Comments

Chi’s picture

Title: Doublefield Formatter » [D7] Doublefield Formatter
Project: Double Field formatter » Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component: Code » module
Issue tags: -Enhanced Formatter for Double Field

Looks like project application issue.

PA robot’s picture

Multiple Applications
It appears that there have been multiple project applications opened under your username:

Project 1: https://www.drupal.org/node/2392699

Project 2: https://www.drupal.org/node/2392703

As successful completion of the project application process results in the applicant being granted the 'Create Full Projects' permission, there is no need to take multiple applications through the process. Once the first application has been successfully approved, then the applicant can promote other projects without review. Because of this, posting multiple applications is not necessary, and results in additional workload for reviewers ... which in turn results in longer wait times for everyone in the queue. With this in mind, your secondary applications have been marked as 'closed(duplicate)', with only one application left open (chosen at random).

If you prefer that we proceed through this review process with a different application than the one which was left open, then feel free to close the 'open' application as a duplicate, and re-open one of the project applications which had been closed.

I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.

PA robot’s picture

Status: Needs review » Needs work

Git clone command for the sandbox is missing in the issue summary, please add it.

We are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)

Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).

I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.

Chi’s picture

Status: Needs work » Closed (duplicate)
apaderno’s picture