Closed (outdated)
Project:
Field Group
Version:
7.x-1.x-dev
Component:
Miscellaneous
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
4 Jun 2013 at 14:23 UTC
Updated:
1 Jun 2024 at 13:07 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
sirtethere's the patch that adds a Div to the list:
Comment #2
sirtetalso, the label element can not be changed by code currently, no theme- or preprocess alters are possible.
Comment #3
jpstrikesback commentedThanks sirtet!!
Here it is as a textfield, next up would be to be able to add a label class but we don't have that now anyways...
Comment #4
jpstrikesback commenteddouble post
Comment #5
jpstrikesback commentedComment #7
jpstrikesback commented#3: 2011706-allow-other-tags-for-fieldgroup-divs.patch queued for re-testing.
Comment #8.0
(not verified) commentedtypo
Comment #9
karenann commentedComment #10
jpstrikesback commentedFire up the bot
Comment #11
jpstrikesback commentedComment #13
jpstrikesback commented3: 2011706-allow-other-tags-for-fieldgroup-divs.patch queued for re-testing.
Comment #15
karenann commentedGiving this another shot.
Comment #16
surgeonbor commented#15 works for me, but in the #description, &rt; needs to be changed to & gt ;
Comment #17
karenann commentedComment #18
Christopher Riley commentedIt would be great if this was committed so we had more options without a custom module or patch.
Comment #19
tisteegz commentedAny chance of this going into a release? It is kind of frustrating to only be able to choose H2 or H3.
EDIT: I am now just using html element instead of div which allows you to choose the label element.
Comment #20
chris matthews commentedThe 3 year old patch in #17 to field_group.module applied cleanly to the latest field_group 7.x-1.x-dev and works good for me as well so changing the status to RTBC.
Comment #21
anybodyConfirming RTBC for #17. I thought about a more defensive approach with listing all elements that make sense in this case. For example this can be seen in Fences module (fences.fences.inc) but well. The input is more flexible.
Are there any security concerns?
Comment #22
anybodyAny chance to commit this?
Comment #23
nils.destoop commented