Copyright

GPL allows developer distribute module under GPL license and you know that. And it was said that ordered module belongs to me and it's code too, before my work on module. And I receive money for my work only. + There was no NDA while module was written
That's why I have all my rights to the module code and right to distribute module under the GPL notice with my copyrights.

The work for your money was completely done.

UPDATE. Also I have information that pvasili was going to sell my module without my copyrights on code but I've published it erlier on d.o.
UPDATE2. For pvasili was written code for 6.x only. 7.x code completely rewritten

Спасибо тебе Вася.

My understanding is all code that interacts with GPL licensed software must also be GPL licensed. By implication, all code (custom or otherwise) that is written for Drupal is GPL licensed and your claims of copyright infringement are not applicable.

Suppose this case should be reviewed in webmasters queue

@pvasili, can you provide a signed contract/agreement that shows that you have the *explicit* right to decide the license for this code? By default, the code belongs to the author and may be licensed GPL by the author.

no contract, no ageement
and before writing module it was said that I write my module under GPL and publish to drupal.org when I need do that.

pvasili just going violate GPL licence by distributing my module to third party without my copyrights.

Just read GPL.

Notice also that such demands are off-topic here: Drupal.org is not a court.

You can use this module in public, then return money spent by the sponsor for its development.
You make yourself advertising on money the customer :(.

read GPL first. and stop lie yourself.
It was said that module is written under GPL(b.t.w I have no rights write module under another license).
And all rights belong to me.

All it was told before I've written this code.

In case of NDA or other agreements I do not publish code on drupal.org.
I your case were not addiitonal agreements about rights for code and all they stayed mine. And all that was told.

>Terms of orders have been - not to publish the work publicly.
oh really? :)
your just a liar.
>You can return the money for this work and then publish the module in public.
people must work for you for free? are you sure?
>This thread is not for you, please, do not close it and do not change the status!
yes yes. you just have right violate GPL and right of author for his/her code. ok.

>This thread is not for you, please, do not close it and do not change the status!
it's directly form me vasya :)
And its about your trolling about somebodys' rights for their code.
and about how does user pvasil violate GPL. ok.

There is nothing we as the webmasters team can do here.

We do not know the details of the case (and I am not sure we want to know them).

Please settle this in a court and let us know what they say.

can this one be closed?

I don't see why this should stay active. We cannot settle your differences for you.

fix

@kiamlaluno, could you please specify why you reopend this case?

@bertboerland, it hasn't been re-opened - the status is still "Closed (won't fix)". To me. it looks like kiamlaluno is doing a spring cleaning of the web-masters queue, transferring anything that has anything to do with licensing, including closed issues, to the LWG issue queue.

my bad, thanks