Hi all.
As of yesterday I've been pulled into converting an existing static site into Drupal. Lots of it looks lovely, especially the ease of install. Then, as many seem to have done, I got stalled when trying to create a one-to-one mapping between old content and drupal 'nodes'. After much time in the handbook and archives, I'd like to share my conclusions, Yes, I think I've got the (or at least an) answer.
Can someone tell me if I've got the wrong end of the stick here?
Background in Information Theory
Drupals much-lamented non-traditional lack of heirachical topic nodes can be stated thus (I think).
A taxonomy term doesn't actually have content, it is merely a label for the container. Hence, a taxonoomy term is not a node, and clicking on a term takes you to a list, not a content block. This is Drupals behaviour, and this is what many folk regard as a 'problem' ... as did I for the first few hours of experimentation and research.
When you think about it, this IS actually analogous to how an URL or filesystem operates.
In /parent/dir/subdir/ , subdir IS NOT CONTENT, it CONTAINS content. :-}
Meditate on this 'till you get it.