Maybe we should add a description in the block of #new_arguments, that explains it can be used later on with rules with higher weight.

CommentFileSizeAuthor
#4 wfng_description_new_arguments_2.patch885 bytesamitaibu
#3 wfng_description_new_arguments_1.patch887 bytesamitaibu

Comments

fago’s picture

fago
Primary language German
Location Vienna
commented
Category: feature » bug

sounds like a great idea. the #new arguments features could need better docs.
It would be great if you could do a patch.

fago’s picture

fago
Primary language German
Location Vienna
commented
Category: bug » task

oops.

amitaibu’s picture

amitaibu
Primary language Hebrew
Location Israel
commented
Assigned: Unassigned » amitaibu
Status: Active » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new wfng_description_new_arguments_1.patch887 bytes

attached patch.

amitaibu’s picture

amitaibu
Primary language Hebrew
Location Israel
commented
StatusFileSize
new wfng_description_new_arguments_2.patch885 bytes

small typo

fago’s picture

fago
Primary language German
Location Vienna
commented
Status: Needs review » Fixed

thanks committed.

I've removed the note about the weights, as it might create confusion when the weight of the current rule is != 0.

Anonymous’s picture

Anonymous (not verified) commented
Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for two weeks with no activity.