This module is a small add-on module that adds support for a new metadata standard, DCAT-US 3.0. Most DKAN sites are based on DCAT-US 1.1. This module creates a runtime transformation to make the catalog available with the new standard, without requiring any data migrations. It also provides some validation tools for site admins. Later, we will provide fuller support in DKAN core for DCAT-US 3.0, but for now this brings US federal gov sites (and anyone else who is interested) into compliance immediately.
The DKAN project was recently featured on the Talking Drupal podcast.
I have been a maintainer of DKAN for over 10 years.
Project link
https://www.drupal.org/project/dkan_dcatus3_bridge
Comments
Comment #2
vishal.kadamComment #3
avpadernoThank you for applying!
Before giving links helpful to understand how the review process works, what to expect from a review, and what to do to avoid a review takes more time than needed, I would like to thank all the reviewers for the work they do.
These applications are volunters-driven, which also means it is not possible to predict when an application will be marked fixed and the applicant will get the permission to opt projects into security advisory policy. While we aim to make an application as quick as possible, it is also important for us that more people review the project used for an application. In this way, we make sure applications do not miss some important points that should be instead reported.
Applications are not meant to be complete debugging sessions that eliminate every existing bug, though. I apologize if sometimes applications seem to go into too-detailed reviews.
Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review gives some hints for a smoother review.
The important notes are the following.
Keep in mind that once the project is opted into security advisory coverage, only Security Team members may change coverage.
To the reviewers
Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications, Application workflow, What to cover in an application review, and Tools to use for reviews.
The important notes are the following.
For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues.
Comment #4
vishal.kadam1. FILE: README.md
The README file is missing the required section - Installation.
2. FILE: dkan_dcatus3_bridge.module
For a new module that aims to be compatible with Drupal 10 and Drupal 11, I would rather implement hooks as class methods as described in Support for object oriented hook implementations using autowired services.
It would require increasing the minimum Drupal 10 version supported, but Drupal 10.1 is no longer supported.
3. FILE: src/Form/SettingsForm.php
With Drupal 10 and Drupal 11, there is no longer need to use #default_value for each form element, when the parent class is ConfigFormBase: It is sufficient to use #config_target, as in the following code.
Using that code, it is no longer needed to save the configuration values in the form submission handler: The parent class will take care of that.
For this change, it is necessary to require at least Drupal 10.3, but that is not an issue, since Drupal 10.2.x is no longer supported.
Comment #5
dafederThanks @vishal.kadam, all reasonable requests, will fix ASAP.
Comment #6
dafederHello, have implemented these suggestions and released 1.0.1.
Comment #7
dafederThere are now some additional code quality fixes in 1.x. No new release yet but I believe you review against the branch directly...
Comment #8
avpadernoYes, reviews are done for the indicated branch.
I would suggest not creating any release for reviews. Creating a stable release during these applications could just create backward-compatibility issues.