Needs work
Project:
Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component:
module
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
3 Jul 2026 at 13:42 UTC
Updated:
4 Aug 2026 at 05:58 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #2
avpadernoThank you for applying!
Before giving links helpful to understand how the review process works, what to expect from a review, and what to do to avoid a review takes more time than needed, I would like to thank all the reviewers for the work they do.
These applications are volunters-driven, which also means it is not possible to predict when an application will be marked fixed and the applicant will get the permission to opt projects into security advisory policy. While we aim to make an application as quick as possible, it is also important for us that more people review the project used for an application. In this way, we make sure applications do not miss some important points that should be instead reported.
Applications are not meant to be complete debugging sessions that eliminate every existing bug, though. I apologize if sometimes applications seem to go into too-detailed reviews.
Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review gives some hints for a smoother review. See also Policy on the use of AI when contributing to Drupal, which is valid when contributing to Drupal, either by committing code in a project, or by creating a merge request for an existing project.
The important notes are the following.
Keep in mind that once the project is opted into security advisory coverage, only Security Team members may change coverage.
To the reviewers
Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications, Application workflow, What to cover in an application review, and Tools to use for reviews.
The important notes are the following.
For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues.
Comment #3
avpadernoRemember to change status, when the project is ready to be reviewed. In this queue, projects are only reviewed when the status is Needs review.
Comment #4
o_timoshchuk commentedComment #5
abdelwahiedReviewed 1.0.x (commit 3f7c696) on Drupal 10.3/11.
AUTOMATED REVIEW
phpcs (Drupal + DrupalPractice) is clean on the PHP/YAML. The remaining violations are in JS / build files:
- assets/js/simpleParallax.js: 6 errors — a lowercase "false" that should be "FALSE" (Drupal JS standard), and missing spaces around a ternary "?" (lines 17-19). This is your own behavior file, so please run it through the Drupal JS standards / prettier.
- vite.config.js: 3 errors (ternary spacing).
- dist/js/simpleParallax.js: flagged as minified.
Suggestion: add a phpcs.xml.dist that excludes build output (dist/) and tooling (vite.config.js), and fix assets/js so phpcs is green on the code you actually maintain.
MANUAL REVIEW — POSITIVES
- The single \Drupal::entityTypeManager() call is inside the static isApplicable() method, where service injection isn't available — this is the accepted core pattern, not an issue.
- No raw SQL and no unsafe output. core_version_requirement ^10.3 || ^11 || ^12, and no hardcoded version/project keys in the .info.yml.
SUGGESTIONS
- The release currently ships build tooling (package.json, package-lock.json, vite.config.js) and a compiled dist/. Consider whether these belong in the packaged release, or add a .gitattributes with export-ignore for the toolchain.
- The bundled simpleParallax.js third-party library should have its version and license documented (Drupal third-party asset policy).
- No automated tests yet — not required for coverage, but a small Kernel/FunctionalJavascript test would strengthen the module.
Good, focused module. Mainly needs the JS coding-standards cleanup and a decision on what to ship in the release.
Comment #6
vishal.kadam1. FILE: README.md
The README file is missing the required sections - Requirements and Configuration.
2. FILE: src/Plugin/Field/FieldFormatter/SimpleParallaxFieldFormatter.php
Projects that are compatible with Drupal 10 or higher versions should use attributes instead of annotations.
Comment #7
o_timoshchuk commentedComment #8
o_timoshchuk commented