Needs review
Project:
Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component:
module
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
12 May 2026 at 14:04 UTC
Updated:
16 May 2026 at 10:56 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #2
vishal.kadamComment #3
avpadernoThank you for applying!
Before giving links helpful to understand how the review process works, what to expect from a review, and what to do to avoid a review takes more time than needed, I would like to thank all the reviewers for the work they do.
These applications are volunters-driven, which also means it is not possible to predict when an application will be marked fixed and the applicant will get the permission to opt projects into security advisory policy. While we aim to make an application as quick as possible, it is also important for us that more people review the project used for an application. In this way, we make sure applications do not miss some important points that should be instead reported.
Applications are not meant to be complete debugging sessions that eliminate every existing bug, though. I apologize if sometimes applications seem to go into too-detailed reviews.
Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review gives some hints for a smoother review.
The important notes are the following.
Keep in mind that once the project is opted into security advisory coverage, only Security Team members may change coverage.
To the reviewers
Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications, Application workflow, What to cover in an application review, and Tools to use for reviews.
The important notes are the following.
For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues.
Comment #4
vishal.kadam1. FILE: README.md
The README file is missing the required section - Requirements.
2. FILE: atomic_cas.module
For a new module that aims to be compatible with Drupal 10 and Drupal 11, I would rather implement hooks as class methods as described in Support for object oriented hook implementations using autowired services.
It would require increasing the minimum Drupal 10 version supported, but Drupal 10.1 is no longer supported.
Drupal does not have primary and secondary hooks. Instead of that, it is preferable to use the usual description: “Hook implementations for the [module name] module”, where [module name] is the name of the module given in its .info.yml file.
Comment #5
parth_sinha commentedThank you for reviewing my module.
I have made the changes:
- updated the README file and bumped the version to 10.2
- Added new file AtomicCasHook.php hook class implementing
hook_file_presave,hook_file_insert,hook_file_delete, andhook_entity_type_alteras class methods annotated with#[Hook('…')]- Added a private array $pendingActions instance property to replace the old static $registry variable, plus four methods,
queueIngest(),setPendingAction(),getPendingAction(),clearPendingAction()that bridge the presave -> insert hook sequence. Using an instance property on the singleton service is equivalent to a static variable but is testable and injectable.Again, Thank you so much
Comment #6
vishal.kadamFILE: atomic_cas.module
Since the module is declared compatible with Drupal 10.2, removing the function implementing the hook is not possible. The function still needs to be defined, but it calls the method defined by the service class, as described in Support for object oriented hook implementations using autowired services (Backwards-compatible Hook implementation for Drupal versions from 10.1 to 11.0).
Comment #7
parth_sinha commentedHi, I update the hooks
- atomic_cas.module -> #[LegacyHook] shims restored
- atomic_cas.services.yml -> service ID changed from atomic_cas.hooks to the FQCN
Comment #8
vishal.kadamRest seems fine to me.
Please wait for other reviewers and Project Moderator to take a look and if everything goes fine, you will get the role.
Comment #9
parth_sinha commentedThank you much..!!!