Problem/Motivation

Tim L asked me to create this issue based on discussions in Slack.

As a maintainer it's easy to accidentally not credit people on issues who should be credited. A simple report would help a lot, so we can easily see which issues don't have credits or don't have full credits and we can go fix them.

Steps to reproduce

Proposed resolution

A simple report for a project with columns like:

  • Date closed (ordered by most recently closed)
  • Issue title linked to issue
  • Link to attribution record
  • Credited (usernames)
  • Not credited (usernames)
  • No credits? (yes/no)?

Bonus points for being able to filter out just the issues where there's at least one person not credited.

Remaining tasks

TBD

User interface changes

Report for maintainers to see the credited users per issue.

API changes

Data model changes

CommentFileSizeAuthor
#4 Screenshot 2026-06-11 at 17.06.28.png139.69 KBfjgarlin

Issue fork infrastructure-3593374

Command icon Show commands

Start within a Git clone of the project using the version control instructions.

Or, if you do not have SSH keys set up on git.drupalcode.org:

    About issue forks

    Comments

    kristen pol created an issue. See original summary.

    kristen pol’s picture

    kristen pol
    she/her
    Primary language English
    Location Santa Cruz, CA, USA
    commented
    Title: Create report for maintainers for all issues with missing credits » Create report for project issues with issue credit information
    fjgarlin’s picture

    fjgarlin commented

    This is not achievable via views, especially the part of aggregated credited vs non-credited and counts/no-credit flag.

    We need to go down the route of controller/service/form.

    The date would be the date that the status of the contribution record changed from draft to public (or vice versa). This is the date used for all calculations.

    fjgarlin’s picture

    fjgarlin commented
    StatusFileSize
    new Screenshot 2026-06-11 at 17.06.28.png139.69 KB

    And having tested a bit, I don't see the benefit of having the listing of users, whether credited or not. A count is really more benefitial. For example, see this: https://new.drupal.org/contribution-record/10141841

    See the screenshot
    screenshot

    My suggestion is: link to contrib record, link to source issue, project name, draft, last status change, number of credited users, number of non-credited users. I think that really achieves what's needed and for details, the links can be clicked.

    fjgarlin’s picture

    fjgarlin commented
    Status: Active » Closed (duplicate)

    I created https://git.drupalcode.org/project/contribution_records/-/work_items/356... and will continue development there.

    Now that this issue is closed, review the contribution record.

    As a contributor, attribute any organization that helped you, or if you volunteered your own time.

    Maintainers, credit people who helped resolve this issue.