Closed (won't fix)
Project:
Editable Fields
Version:
6.x-1.1
Component:
User interface
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Support request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
22 Feb 2009 at 04:52 UTC
Updated:
14 Mar 2014 at 23:00 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
markfoodyburton commentedCan you check the latest version, it should fix the problem I think
Cheers
Mark.
Comment #2
bekasu commentedI'm using 6.x-1.1 and it stacks the fields.
I tried : Home>>Administer>>Content Management>>'my content type'>>Display Fields>>Field Label changed to Inline and saved. Refreshed the screen and no change.
Also emptied the cache, no change.
Tried it in firefox and IE.
Any other ideas? (or am i being dense and you wanted me to try the dev version?)
Becky (p.s. thanks for trying to help)
Comment #3
markfoodyburton commentedThe Dev version may help - I hope so. If not, then I guess you may need to go in and change your theme's css or some such?
Cheers
Mark.
Comment #4
bekasu commentedDev version didn't help.
I've tried modifying the style sheet. Am able to change the color of the field text so I know I have the css field reference correct, however using display: inline, width: 200px, float: left, etc .. nothing moves the radio buttons inline.
I also marked the font-weight: bold and when the screen initially loads i see the field labels in bold; however, when it loads the second radio button the font-weight returns to normal weight. I've also begun wondering if this is an ajax css issue.
I've also been pursing cck single field theming support requests to see if that could solve my problem.. no success yet.
The field value that is selected is in the page source; however, the field value that is NOT selected is NOT in the page source.. due to the collapsible nature of the ajax??
Currently still stumped; but still researching possibilities.
bekasu
Comment #5
vannus commentedthink this is similar to what im getting on 6.x-2.0 where i get
and i want
adding below to editablefields.css makes things inline for me
dunno if it breaks anything else though.
Comment #6
mengi commentedPer https://drupal.org/node/2148735, 6.x is longer maintained so issue is closed. If you wish to be a maintainer of the 6.x branch please create a new issue.