Summary and questions about recent case study submissions

Thistleseer has uploaded seven community case studies recently, which i have looked over and made the odd suggestion. On the whole, most of them are adequate enough though i'd prefer they contained some key modules. I think i'll make this request.

One case study I'm not sure what to do with, is this one: http://drupal.org/node/1840232. It relates to an Intranet so the author has entered a dud URL http://drupal.org/- . The real URL is https://intranet.n-va.be but this just takes us to a login page. I'm tempted to hide the case study, but the author asked for advice so I said I'd get back to her.

Poor / inadequate case studies

http://drupal.org/node/1839790 - hidden and author contacted (19 Nov)
http://drupal.org/node/1832494 - hidden and author contacted (19 Nov)
http://drupal.org/node/1829060 - hidden and author contacted (19 Nov)
http://drupal.org/node/1813310 - hidden (27 Nov), author contacted (19 Nov)
http://drupal.org/node/1808204 - hidden and author contacted (19 Nov)
http://drupal.org/node/1805268 - hidden and author contacted (19 Nov)
http://drupal.org/node/1804670 - hidden and author contacted (19 Nov)
http://drupal.org/node/1803436 - hidden and author contacted (19 Nov)
http://drupal.org/node/1801062 - hidden and author contacted (19 Nov)
http://drupal.org/node/1798612 - hidden (27 Nov), author contacted (19 Nov)
http://drupal.org/node/1792382 - hidden and author contacted (20 Nov)
http://drupal.org/node/1791500 - hidden and author contacted (20 Nov)

Borderline poor / inadequate case studies

http://drupal.org/node/1821710 - hidden and author contacted (20 Nov)
http://drupal.org/node/1818170 - hidden and author contacted (20 Nov)
http://drupal.org/node/1812082 & http://drupal.org/node/1812078 - hidden and author contacted (20 Nov)

Promotion potentials

http://drupal.org/node/1834716 - Done: http://drupal.org/node/1846044
http://drupal.org/node/1828576 - Done: http://drupal.org/node/1846050
http://drupal.org/node/1805052

Non-English titles

I added a few English translations to some case study titles and updated their revision log to reflect this. Is that a reasonable thing to do?
http://drupal.org/node/1836408
http://drupal.org/node/1835376

Current guidelines state:
'... Use only the name of the site you are writing about.'

Some authors appear to misread this as 'use only the URL of the site', which often produces dull or meaningless titles. We advise against words like "case study" and "success story", which is absolutely right, but should I update the guidelines to allow some wriggle room?

Summary

I'll be contacting authors and hiding the 'poor' list, unless otherwise advised.

Would like some second opinions on the borderlines and on the Featured potentials.

There are a few case study promotions awaiting author input. I'm going to run through them over the next week or two and make some updates myself. See if I can't nudge the authors.