DOI id 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260790 has multiple isbns returned from crossref. Currently, the parser somewhat concatenates the two. I'm not sure which isbn it should pick, but what it does now is wrong.

Comments

rjerome’s picture

rjerome commented
Status: Active » Fixed

The multiple ISBN/ISSN were coming from "print" and "electronic" versions. I have opted to use the "print" issn/isbn by default.

Ron.

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.