Closed (fixed)
Project:
Exportables
Version:
6.x-1.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Support request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
5 Mar 2010 at 21:53 UTC
Updated:
5 Mar 2010 at 22:41 UTC
How is this module different than the Features module? I ask because this is one of four similar modules listed at Configuration Management, Automation & Features, and Features appears to be furthest along.
I feel the functionality promised by these modules is a critical Drupal innovation. I appreciate that you are doing this, but want to see if there's any duplicate work and any opportunity for the troops to rally around one effort.
Comments
Comment #1
jazzslider commentedThe Features module is definitely the one to rally around; Exportables only exists as a sidekick module to help make certain core modules conform to Features's expectations.
More specifically: Features allows you to export configurations (content types, views, etc.) as code that can then be easily re-deployed on other sites, but those configurations _must_ each be associated with a machine-readable name, rather than just a numeric ID. This works well for content types, views, and the like, but does not work for, say, taxonomy vocabularies, terms, or nodes (since Drupal core doesn't provide machine-readable names for such things). The Exportables module aims to provide those machine-readable names, along with export functionality, so that those modules' configurations can also be included in exported features.
All that said, I should reiterate: our efforts here at Exportables are intended to _support_ Features, not compete with it.
Thanks!
Adam