Closed (fixed)
Project:
Member Platform
Version:
1.0.x-dev
Component:
Meeting
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
28 Jul 2025 at 06:42 UTC
Updated:
27 Aug 2025 at 04:34 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
| James Shields | Hi, James here (lostcarpark). |
| paulmckibben | Paul McKibben (paulmckibben), Atlanta Drupal Users Group |
| beautifulmind | Bhavin Joshi (beautifulmind) |
| bsnodgrass (he/him) | Hello, bsnodgrass from St Charles IL (Chicago area) |
| James Shields | We got a new dog last week (partly why I didn't get much done on CMS)... Ben on the left is a rescue dog, about a year old. Luke is our 2½ year old border collie. |
| Steve Ayers | Bluegeek9 |
| Lee Walker (mr_scumbag) | Hello everyone. Lee Walker/mr_scumbag |
| mtift | mtift - Lake Fellowship |
| jdleonard | JD Leonard (jdleonard) |
| Janice C. | Hello everyone, Janice from NYC here joining the "slack meeting" for the very first time! |
| James Shields | Sorry, I was hoping to look at some CMS issues over the weekend, but real life got in the way! |
| jdleonard | Today got unexpectedly crazy for me. Only sitting down now! |
| bsnodgrass (he/him) | What do we think about the proposed structure for a persona:Personal NameDefinition:User Stories:Suggestions and Notes: |
| bsnodgrass (he/him) | Essentially merging user stories into the various personas we identify. |
| jdleonard | I don't think I'm opposed to a given user story being nested under the persona it serves. |
| jdleonard | However, I wouldn't want to lose the humanizing narrative. For example, the wants/needs of Paul (which perhaps we should rename him to avoid confusion that we're not literally talking about our Paul; I drafted them arbitrarily picking him as an example). I see that as a preamble to facilitate alignment and guide the creation of user stories. Arguably it could be made a little higher level. |
| jdleonard | I'd propose that "suggestions" for 1.0 be added as either comments or specific suggested changes to reflect that they need resolution. For post-1.0, I'd propose that they be handled as described under the "Future Enhancements (Out of Scope for 1.0)" heading. |
| jdleonard | Would appreciate any others' thoughts. |
| jdleonard | I'll give this a thorough review as soon as I can. Probably Tuesday. |
| bsnodgrass (he/him) | I can have a look later today or tomorrow |
| James Shields | I will try to test over the next day or two! |
| paulmckibben | Likewise! |
| jdleonard | Will try to do so tomorrow! |
Comments
Comment #2
bluegeek9 commentedComment #6
jdleonard