[1.0.x] Domain Access Favicon

Thank you for applying!

Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review gives some hints for a smoother review.

The important notes are the following.

• If you have not done it yet, you should run phpcs --standard=Drupal,DrupalPractice on the project, which alone fixes most of what reviewers would report.
• For the time this application is open, only your commits are allowed.
• The purpose of this application is giving you a new drupal.org role that allows you to opt projects into security advisory coverage, either projects you already created, or projects you will create. The project status won't be changed by this application and no other user will be able to opt projects into security advisory policy.
• We only accept an application per user. If you change your mind about the project to use for this application, or it is necessary to use a different project for the application, please update the issue summary with the link to the correct project and the issue title with the project name and the branch to review.

To the reviewers

Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications, Application workflow, What to cover in an application review, and Tools to use for reviews.

The important notes are the following.

• It is preferable to wait for a Code Review Administrator before commenting on newly created applications. Code Review Administrators will do some preliminary checks that are necessary before any change on the project files is suggested.
• Reviewers should show the output of a CLI tool only once per application.
• It may be best to have the applicant fix things before further review.

For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues.

1. Fix phpcs issues.

phpcs --standard=Drupal,DrupalPractice --extensions=php,module,inc,install,test,profile,theme,css,info,txt,md,yml domain_access_favicon/

FILE: domain_access_favicon/domain_access_favicon.module
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOUND 0 ERRORS AND 2 WARNINGS AFFECTING 2 LINES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 10 | WARNING | [x] Unused use statement
 49 | WARNING | [x] A comma should follow the last multiline array item. Found: ]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHPCBF CAN FIX THE 2 MARKED SNIFF VIOLATIONS AUTOMATICALLY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

FILE: domain_access_favicon/src/Form/DomainAccessFaviconSettingsForm.php
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOUND 1 ERROR AFFECTING 1 LINE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 7 | ERROR | [x] Use statements should be sorted alphabetically. The first wrong one is Drupal\Core\Entity\EntityTypeManagerInterface.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHPCBF CAN FIX THE 1 MARKED SNIFF VIOLATIONS AUTOMATICALLY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. FILE: domain_access_favicon.module

/**
 * @file
 * Domain-based access control for favicons.
 */

The usual description for a .module file is Hook implementations for the [module name] module. where [module name] is the module name given in the .info.yml file.

3. FILE: src/Form/DomainAccessFaviconSettingsForm.php

  /**
   * Construct function.
   *
   * @param \Drupal\Core\Config\ConfigFactoryInterface $config_factory
   *   The factory for configuration objects.
   * @param \Drupal\Core\Entity\EntityTypeManagerInterface $entity_type_manager
   *   Entity type manager.
   */
  public function __construct(ConfigFactoryInterface $config_factory, EntityTypeManagerInterface $entity_type_manager) {

The documentation comment for constructors is not mandatory anymore, If it is given, the description must be Constructs a new [class name] object. where [class name] includes the class namespace.

I am changing priority as per Issue priorities.

This thread has been idle, in the needs work state with no activity for several months. Therefore, I am assuming that you are no longer pursuing this application.

May you confirm you are still pursuing this application? If this is the case, and you made commits basing on what previously reported, or you can answer the questions previously asked, please change the status to Needs review.

This thread has been idle, in the Needs work state with no activity for about six months or more; the application has been created about 11 months ago or more. Therefore, I marked it as Closed (won't fix).

If this is incorrect, and you are still pursuing this application, please feel free to re-open it and set the issue status to Needs work or Needs review, depending on the current status of your code.