Closed (won't fix)
Project:
Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component:
module
Priority:
Minor
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
22 Oct 2024 at 10:03 UTC
Updated:
8 Oct 2025 at 15:04 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #2
vishal.kadamComment #3
vishal.kadamThank you for applying!
For these applications, we need a project where, in at least the branch used for the application, most of the commits (if not all the commits) have been done from the user who applies. You have only renamed the module files and changed namespaces in files in your commit.
The purpose of these applications is reviewing a project to understand what the person who applies understands about writing secure code that follows the Drupal coding standards and correctly uses the Drupal API, not what all the project maintainers collectively understand about those points.
This application can only continue with a project (and a branch) where all the commits (or the majority of the commits) have been done by you.
Comment #4
avpadernoThe fist commit done by neelam-webdev significantly changed the files. This application is acceptable.
Comment #5
avpadernoThank you for applying!
Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review gives some hints for a smoother review.
The important notes are the following.
Keep in mind that once the project is opted into security advisory coverage, only Security Team members may change coverage.
To the reviewers
Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications, Application workflow, What to cover in an application review, and Tools to use for reviews.
The important notes are the following.
For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues.
Comment #6
vishal.kadam1. Fix phpcs issues.
See attached file - sudc-phpcs-issues.txt
2. FILE: sudc.libraries.yml
version: VERSIONVERSION is only used by Drupal core modules. Contributed modules should use a literal string that does not change with the Drupal core version a site is using.
3. FILE: sudc.module
The usual description for a .module file is Hook implementations for the [module name] module. where [module name] is the module name given in the .info.yml file.
4. FILE: README.txt
Replace README.txt with README.md file, that should follow the content and formatting described in README.md template.
5. FILE: templates/helpcontent.html.twig, templates/su-results.html.twig, templates/sufooter.html.twig
Twig code needs to be correctly indented. Drupal uses two spaces for indentation, not four spaces or tabs.
6. FILE: templates/su-results.html.twig
Move all scripts (JavaScript) and styles (CSS) into a library and attach them. See the process here.
{# <script type="text/javascript" src="{{ data.epoint }}/resources/search_clients_custom/{{ data.uid }}/external_scripts.js"></script> #}{# <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ data.epoint }}/resources/search_clients_custom/{{ data.uid }}/external_styles.css"> #}Remove commented code.
7. FILE: js/index.js
Javascript code needs to be correctly indented. Drupal uses two spaces for indentation, not four spaces or tabs.
8. FILE: src/Controller/SuResultController.php
FILE: src/Services/CommonCalls.php
FILE: src/Services/RestCalls.php
The documentation comment for constructors is not mandatory anymore, If it is given, the description must be Constructs a new [class name] object. where [class name] includes the class namespace.
Comment #7
rushikesh raval commentedI am changing priority as per Issue priorities.
Comment #8
avpadernoThis thread has been idle, in the needs work state with no activity for some months.
May you confirm you are still pursuing this application? If this is the case, and you made commits basing on what previously reported, or you can answer the questions previously asked, please change the status to Needs review.
Comment #9
avpadernoThis thread has been idle, in the Needs work state with no activity for about six months or more; the application has been created about 11 months ago or more. Therefore, I marked it as Closed (won't fix).
If this is incorrect, and you are still pursuing this application, please feel free to re-open it and set the issue status to Needs work or Needs review, depending on the current status of your code.