Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal core - Layout Initiative
Component:
Meetings
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
10 Jul 2018 at 00:12 UTC
Updated:
31 Jul 2018 at 20:49 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
| timplunkett | Tim from Philly |
| imagineddesign | Kelly from Chicago |
| mark_fullmer | Mark from Tucson |
| sugaroverflow | Fatima from space
jk Canada |
| tedbow | Ted from Ithaca, NY |
| sugaroverflow | ~haha there’s nothing on the agenda~ oh the agenda lies its all in tim’s brain |
| Tyler Fahey | Tyler from Austin TX |
| japerry | heyo |
| samuel.mortenson | :wave: from pdx |
| starshaped | Aubrey from Boston, just lurking to learn more about Layouts :slightly_smiling_face: |
| eclipsegc | Kris from OKC |
| johndevman | John from Sweden |
| dyannenova | Emilie, currently in Vancouver, WA |
| timplunkett | This should allow existing sites to use LB without extra problems, and also make it easier for Umami |
| mark_fullmer | I'd seen someone propose a contrib module that enables LB on all entities. Something like that (or at least enables it on all node types) seems like a good companion to this decision. |
| timplunkett | Agreed! |
| mark_fullmer | Would we entertain a LB-based admin/configuration page which controls where it's enabled? |
| timplunkett | I thought about that, would need some UX input there |
| samuel.mortenson | Content Moderation would be a great reference for that |
| samuel.mortenson | You used to enable it on individual entity bundle config forms, but they moved it to one big form |
| Tyler Fahey | That seems like a good paradigm for LB to me |
| mark_fullmer | Just a quick update: https://www.drupal.org/project/layout_builder_restrictions is pretty much fully-baked at this point :+1::skin-tone-4: |
| tedbow | @mark_fullmer nice! |
| tedbow | still working on https://www.drupal.org/project/drupal/issues/2957425
in review stage now |
| eclipsegc | @tedbow how's this going? |
| eclipsegc | sorry I've been so focussed internally lately, I really wish I were focussed on this instead |
| eclipsegc | can it still make 8.6? |
| tedbow | @eclipsegc I think it is going good. I hope so. |
| eclipsegc | k |
| eclipsegc | anything you need to make that happen? |
| tedbow | getting review on the dependent issue now https://www.drupal.org/project/drupal/issues/2976334 |
| tedbow | Wim reviewed that and seemed not to hate so thats good :wink: |
| tedbow | these are on @timplunkett radar to review |
| eclipsegc | ok awesome |
| timplunkett | @eclipsegc review from you on that one would be great too |
| tedbow | yep |
| tedbow | @eclipsegc definitely would be great to get a review. just didn’t know if you had time. |
| eclipsegc | on both? or the dependency? |
| tedbow | @eclipsegc I would the layout builder one needs more of a review. |
| tedbow | since the other has had more eyes on it |
| eclipsegc | @tedbow ok give me the links of exactly what you want reviewed and I'll try to make it happen today |
| eclipsegc | @tedbow pm them so I have them to refer to |
| tedbow | @eclipsegc layout_builder one https://www.drupal.org/project/drupal/issues/2957425
which is built on https://www.drupal.org/project/drupal/issues/2976334 (more have looked at this one) |
| tedbow | will do |
Comments
Comment #3
tim.plunkettComment #5
tim.plunkettComment #7
tim.plunkettComment #9
tim.plunkettComment #11
tim.plunkettComment #12
tim.plunkett