Closed (fixed)
Project:
Views Reference Field
Version:
8.x-2.x-dev
Component:
Documentation
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
30 Jun 2017 at 02:28 UTC
Updated:
10 Aug 2020 at 16:09 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #2
NewZeal commentedLooks like viewfield only has a select option and currently doesn't have provision for more advanced options. Otherwise they use the same principle.
Comment #3
2phaThanks for the reply.
I ended up going for this module and it has all the functionality that I need thanks.
Comment #4
colanAs done elsewhere, please add a Similar Modules section to the project page here, listing Viewfield, and an explanation such as the one above. Thanks! (Otherwise, folks need to dig through all of these issues to figure out the difference.)
Longer term, please consider #1299222: Merge the Views Reference Field and Viewfield modules as there seems to be a lot of overlap between the modules. Combining efforts would prevent work duplication. Please also add a link to this issue on the project page, wherever you mention the other module.
Comment #5
jasonawantI recently want created #3094888: Requesting project co-maintainership and then came across this issue while looking at all 8.x-1.x issues.
Here's a comparison I've put together so far.
Viewsreference 8.x-1.x-dev features

Viewsreference 8.x-2.x-dev features:
TBD
Viewfield 8.x-3.x version features

If this is checked, you must provide a default value.
This option may be useful for some specialized cases, e.g., to force rendering of an attachment display even if there are no view results. Includes additional config to render Empty view title.
Comment #6
jasonawantComment #7
colanI added #5 to the new comparison page in the docs.
Now we need to add 2.x information there, and then link to it from the project page. I believe 1.x is no longer supported.
Comment #8
seanbAdded a link to the documentation page on the project homepage. Thanks for starting this, it looks great!