We define an isHidden() method for processor-added properties, but then completely ignore it in the UI (probably after one of the refactorings in this area).
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #4 | 2800011-4--hide_hidden_properties.patch | 1.57 KB | drunken monkey |
| #4 | 2800011-4--hide_hidden_properties--tests_only.patch | 687 bytes | drunken monkey |
Comments
Comment #2
drunken monkeySimple fix.
Comment #3
borisson_Should we also add a test for that? I think an integration test should suffice to cover this.
Comment #4
drunken monkeyYou're right on both counts, of course. Thanks!
Comment #6
borisson_test-only fails, test is very small and looks very readable. Great work!
Comment #8
drunken monkeyOK, thanks for reviewing and the suggestion!
Committed.