This module will help you to analyze your comment text in a better way and generate a pie chart report using HighCharts JS plugin.
Sentiment Analysis is the process of determining whether a piece of writing is positive, negative or neutral. It’s also known as opinion mining, deriving the opinion or attitude of a speaker. Using this module, you can track comments to determine how they are viewed positively/negatively/neutral on the web.
This module uses sentiment analysis API provided by DatumBox.
git clone --branch 7.x-1.x https://git.drupal.org/sandbox/mepushpendra/2756333.git comment_sentiment_analysis
Module Url: https://www.drupal.org/sandbox/mepushpendra/2756333
Comments
Comment #2
yogeshmpawarHi mepushpendra,
Please change git clone URL of the project. The URL you have added in this post is for maintainers.
If we use this URL to clone the project then it asks us to provide mepushpendra@git.drupal.org's password.
Please change the URL so that community members can clone and review the module.
Comment #3
yogeshmpawarHi mepushpendra,
Pareview.sh is giving following errors.
http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxmepushpendra2756333git
Will do a manual review in some time.
Comment #4
mepushpendra commentedComment #5
mepushpendra commentedHere is Git command for non-maintainers
git clone --branch 7.x-1.x https://git.drupal.org/sandbox/mepushpendra/2756333.git comment_sentiment_analysis
Comment #6
PA robot commentedProject 1: https://www.drupal.org/node/2758289
Project 2: https://www.drupal.org/node/2758295
As successful completion of the project application process results in the applicant being granted the 'Create Full Projects' permission, there is no need to take multiple applications through the process. Once the first application has been successfully approved, then the applicant can promote other projects without review. Because of this, posting multiple applications is not necessary, and results in additional workload for reviewers ... which in turn results in longer wait times for everyone in the queue. With this in mind, your secondary applications have been marked as 'closed(duplicate)', with only one application left open (chosen at random).
If you prefer that we proceed through this review process with a different application than the one which was left open, then feel free to close the 'open' application as a duplicate, and re-open one of the project applications which had been closed.
I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.
Comment #7
yogeshmpawarManual Review
Individual user account
Yes: Follows the guidelines for individual user accounts.
No duplication
No: Causes module duplication and/or fragmentation.
Master Branch
Yes: Follows the guidelines for master branch.
Licensing
Yes: Follows the licensing requirements.
3rd party assets/code
Yes: Follows the guidelines for 3rd party assets/code.
README.txt/README.md
No: Not Follows the guidelines for in-project documentation and/or the README Template.
Please refer to this link https://www.drupal.org/node/2181737 for README Template
Code long/complex enough for review
Yes: Follows the guidelines for project length and complexity.
Secure code
Yes: Meets the security requirements.
Coding style & Drupal API usage
[List of identified issues in no particular order. Use (*) and (+) to indicate an issue importance. Replace the text below by the issues themselves:
(*) 1. On configuration page when i click on "Process Pending/New Comments" then i got below error as "PDOException: SQLSTATE[42000]: Syntax error or access violation: 1064 You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '))' at line 1: SELECT node.nid AS entity_id, node.vid AS revision_id, node.type AS bundle, :entity_type AS entity_type FROM {node} node WHERE (node.type IN ()) ; Array ( [:entity_type] => node ) in EntityFieldQuery->execute()".
so please look into this issue & fix this.
(+) 1. It would be good, if you implement hook_help in your module.
Just a recommendation
Nothing
The starred items (*) are fairly big issues and warrant going back to Needs Work. Items marked with a plus sign (+) are important and should be addressed before a stable project release. The rest of the comments in the code walkthrough are recommendations.
If added, please don't remove the security tag, we keep that for statistics and to show examples of security problems.
This review uses the Project Application Review Template.
Comment #8
avpaderno