Part of meta-issue #1856630: [Change notice] [META] Rename Views methods to core standards

CommentFileSizeAuthor
#6 rename_views_method-2002930-6.patch3.19 KBmarlatt
#6 interdiff.txt2.8 KBmarlatt
#2 rename_valueValidate-2002930-2.patch3.17 KBmarlatt
#1 rename_valueValidate-2002930-1.patch1.85 KBmarkie

Comments

markie’s picture

markie commented
Assigned: Unassigned » markie
Status: Active » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new rename_valueValidate-2002930-1.patch1.85 KB

patched.. but not the taxonomy module. (function exists there)

marlatt’s picture

marlatt commented
StatusFileSize
new rename_valueValidate-2002930-2.patch3.17 KB

Included additional instances of method changes and added public method changes.

markie’s picture

markie commented

do we want to modify a different module in this change? I am cool with the public access addition, but don't want to step on other modules toes.

markie’s picture

markie commented

I take this back. I realize now they are extending a views class here. Please disregard the silly monkey.

aspilicious’s picture

aspilicious commented
Status: Needs review » Needs work

This is a function only used internally by filter plugins. I would use "protected" in that case.

marlatt’s picture

marlatt commented
Status: Needs work » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new interdiff.txt2.8 KB
new rename_views_method-2002930-6.patch3.19 KB

Revised methods from public to protected.

dawehner’s picture

dawehner
Primary language German
commented
Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community

No calls are left, patch applies and looks fine.

alexpott’s picture

alexpott
he/they
Primary language English
Location 🇪🇺🌍
commented
Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Fixed

Committed 7731380 and pushed to 8.x. Thanks!

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.