We need to review first for All Providers and then after you are listed there for a while, you can request Featured Provider listing by changing the title of this issue and we will review you for Featured.
Yep, that's right. I've said it previously, and I'll say it again! - solid contributions, worthy of Featured provider.
+1 for Featured Provider.
You should expect +1's from the previous users who have left comments, and potentially a 3rd, then one of the moderators will set you to featured if they have no other problems.
FYI Featured listing can sometimes take a bit longer than service listing since it requires a more thorough review, and usually by more reviewers... be patient and it should happen soon enough!
Please provide links to the non-code contributions such as speaking at events. When reviewing for Featured Provider, we are looking for a variety to contributions, both code and non-code, over an extended length of time. Review the Marketplace guidelines for more information.
Closing this issue since it has been more than 4 weeks without a response to update requests. This issue can be set to Needs Review again after updates are complete and we will continue the review process.
I've updated the drunomics page to include more non-code contributions also. I've listed only the most recent session contributions - I guess the older ones (dating back to 2007) are not necessarily of interest.
Well, those old contributions would show the prolonged engagement that is part of what we like to see of featured providers. Perhaps you could simply add a sentence mentioning the history of speaking gigs?
In general +1 for featured. Good, valuable contributions all around.
Sorry, I've been hectic recently and not looked at the queue in a while!
I'm all for +1, however as it's a featured request I'm going to hold off for another week in case one of the others disagrees. Feel free to give me a bump next week and I'll return and add you as a featured provider so long as no one else has disagreed.
Comments
Comment #1
fagoPlease review and promote us as featured provider!
Comment #2
dddave commented+1
(not a review, just an endorsement)
Comment #3
dsquaredb commented+1 for All Providers.
We need to review first for All Providers and then after you are listed there for a while, you can request Featured Provider listing by changing the title of this issue and we will review you for Featured.
Comment #4
rickdonohoe commented+1 for all providers. Best of luck with Featured listing too when it comes to it, you appear to have a solid variety of contributions!
Comment #5
dsquaredb commentedAdded to All Providers. Issue set to Fixed.
Comment #7
fagook, according to #3 I re-opent to request being promoted to featured :-)
Comment #8
rickdonohoe commentedYep, that's right. I've said it previously, and I'll say it again! - solid contributions, worthy of Featured provider.
+1 for Featured Provider.
You should expect +1's from the previous users who have left comments, and potentially a 3rd, then one of the moderators will set you to featured if they have no other problems.
FYI Featured listing can sometimes take a bit longer than service listing since it requires a more thorough review, and usually by more reviewers... be patient and it should happen soon enough!
Comment #9
dsquaredb commentedPlease provide links to the non-code contributions such as speaking at events. When reviewing for Featured Provider, we are looking for a variety to contributions, both code and non-code, over an extended length of time. Review the Marketplace guidelines for more information.
Comment #10
dsquaredb commentedClosing this issue since it has been more than 4 weeks without a response to update requests. This issue can be set to Needs Review again after updates are complete and we will continue the review process.
Comment #11
fagosry for letting this lie so long.
I've updated the drunomics page to include more non-code contributions also. I've listed only the most recent session contributions - I guess the older ones (dating back to 2007) are not necessarily of interest.
Please review https://drupal.org/node/1973708
Comment #12
dddave commentedWell, those old contributions would show the prolonged engagement that is part of what we like to see of featured providers. Perhaps you could simply add a sentence mentioning the history of speaking gigs?
In general +1 for featured. Good, valuable contributions all around.
Comment #13
fagoThanks, ok I added a little bit more history - see https://drupal.org/node/1973708/revisions/view/2862249/2868771
Comment #14
dddave commentedLooks good to me. Now +1 more then ever. ;)
Comment #15
fagoThanks, what's required now to move on with this? Get more reviews maybe?
Comment #16
dddave commentedBasically one of the other maintainers needs to +1 this and promote it. This should happen soonish but currently we are stretched a bit thin.
Comment #17
rickdonohoe commentedSorry, I've been hectic recently and not looked at the queue in a while!
I'm all for +1, however as it's a featured request I'm going to hold off for another week in case one of the others disagrees. Feel free to give me a bump next week and I'll return and add you as a featured provider so long as no one else has disagreed.
Comment #18
fagobump :)
Comment #19
dsquaredb commentedAdded to Featured Providers. Organization can now be found at https://drupal.org/marketplace/drunomics
Comment #20
fagoThanks!
Comment #21
dsquaredb commented