Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal core
Version:
7.x-dev
Component:
Stark theme
Priority:
Minor
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
8 Jan 2013 at 11:54 UTC
Updated:
13 Apr 2015 at 19:14 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file


Comments
Comment #1
aendra commentedAnd a patch. File used is the one specified above (I.e., http://drupal.org/misc/favicon.ico).
Comment #2
aendra commentedUpdating title for clarity.
Comment #2.0
aendra commentedClarified "perfect".
Comment #2.1
aendra commentedAdded article link.
Comment #3
cilefen commentedUpdated the summary, tagged "novice", changed to 8.x and component "Stark theme".
Comment #4
cilefen commentedComment #5
cilefen commentedBefore:

After:

Comment #6
cilefen commentedComment #7
davidhernandezI'm struggling to think why a theme would depend on the 16x16 file. Are there use cases anyone knows of? I believe it is documented that older browsers will size down the larger image.
Comment #8
cilefen commentedThe icon file in the patch contains 16x16 and 32x32.
Comment #9
cilefen commentedComment #10
cilefen commentedComment #11
cilefen commentedComment #12
Bojhan commentedSounds good.
Comment #13
sam152 commentedManually tested, looks great. Can't think of any reason this shouldn't be RTBC. Not sure anything would reasonably depend on the size of the icon.
Comment #14
webchickNice!
Committed and pushed to 8.x. Thanks!
Comment #17
webchickSilly testbot.
Comment #18
cilefen commentedCan anyone think of a reason not to backport this?
Comment #19
markhalliwellI do not see why not, go for it.
Comment #20
dcam commentedSetting the status so it will get noticed by patch-porters.
Comment #21
cilefen commentedD7 patch.
Comment #22
jecunningham2281 commentedTested in Drupal 7.34 Everything Looks good to me.
Comment #23
chuchunaku commented#SprintWeekend2015
Comment #24
mikemiles86Comment #27
dcam commentedComment #30
David_Rothstein commentedTestbot fluke.
Comment #33
dcam commentedComment #34
David_Rothstein commentedCommitted to 7.x - thanks!